Gunnair Gunnair:
[quote="Arctic_Menace
While that is true, it will help reduce the strain on the navy in terms of enforcing our sovereignty in the arctic. By at least beginning to arm our coast guard (which has lots of experience in the North), we're showing that we're serious about our Arctic claims and the NWP.
Well again, yes and no. By arming a CG icebreaker with an RCMP officer and boarding party, you've given them the capability to do what exactly? Not much really. Putting a .50 cal HMG on an icebreaker and saying it can protect our soverignty is like putting wheels on your grandmother and calling her a wagon.
These are CIVSPEC ships, AM, not warships. These are civilian crews, unionized civilian crews. Just tackling that part of the deal will likely be difficult, let alone trying to take an essentially civilian ship (no offence to my coast guard brethren) and teach it how to fight.[/quote]
I can see where you're coming from but it stillsends a visible message that we are serious. Sure, a .50 cal is a peashooter of a weapon for a ship but at least they will have SOME kind of capability instead of just "hey, you! Stop that right quick or we will send a strongly worded letter to your home country!"