$1:
"I'm not ashamed to say that, in caucus, I have more pro-life MPs supporting me than supporting Stockwell Day."
Yeah? And?
$1:
There's also his 1995 assertion that "providing for the poor is a provincial, not a federal responsibility."
I agree, the provinces and municipalities should be shouldering the bulk of responsibility, although there's no reason the fed can't kick in and help out at least.
$1:
Quebec's language law was designed by the Parti Québécois "to suppress the basic freedoms of English-speaking Quebecers and to ghettoize the French-speaking majority into an ethnic state."
Sooo, he's in shit for speaking fact? We're pretty squeamish in this country if facts are controversial to speak about.
$1:
"the private provision of publicly insured services should be permitted. The monopoly of provision of services is not a value that, in and of itself, is worth preserving."
Or his lament, also in 2002, that the Canada Health Act "rules out private, public-delivery options, It rules out co-payment, pre-payment and all kinds of options that are frankly going to have to be looked at if we're going to deal with the challenges that the system faces."
He is correct to some degree because the status quo as per health care isn't cutting it anymore. I think there may be ways to mix the two systems without killing the public option and keeping it viable.