The biggest problem is that we're still using the old, and outdated American version of race classifications in Canada. A 300 year old model. Obviously, we're not America and we can't use their system. In fact, even they shouldn't use that system of classification but that's for another thread.
The Globe and Mail recently had a good piece on why we can't just lump people into "Visible Minorities" and Everyone Else (everyone else being white Canadians, white immigrants, and aboriginals). They also cited research work done on specific groups of people in Canada.
For example, black Canadians, and black Caribbeans couldn't be further apart. African Canadians (from Africa) have attainment rates that are very high, we'd call them 'elites'. I'm sure if we let in many of Lagos' or Nairobi's elites immigrate here they'd be just as wealthy as the Hong Kong citizens who came here during ths 90s and their kids will have no problems going to the best schools, getting the best jobs, and earning top dollars. Black Caribbeans on the other hand, tend to have very low attainment rates in education, jobs, housing etc, almost anywhere they go.
On the other hand, amongst whites, there are massive disparities also. The Portuguese are the most 'uneducated' whites. However Greeks are the most underpaid. Greeks make 40% of what Anglo Canadians make. Anglos have by far the highest earnings in Canada, with or without an education. They tend to increase the 'white average'. The Chinese (from Hong Kong), and Japanese, tend to have very high earnings and educational attainment also, but they tend to bump up the overall "Asian" average as their Vietnamese, Cambodia, Laotian, and Pilipino counterparts are underperformers, ranking right along the Caribbeans.
So, all in all, it's so complicated, so difficult, and so politically challenging to get into this topic, without emotions running wild on all sides.
martin14 martin14:
Worked well enough in South Africa.
That was completely different.