CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:51 am
 


Title: Judge's husband pleads guilty over naked photos
Category: Law & Order
Posted By: wildrosegirl
Date: 2011-03-28 08:13:25
Canadian


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 New York Rangers
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11240
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:51 am
 


Sleez bag.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 50938
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:00 am
 


So, let me get this straight. A man (lawyer) has a client, whom he sends naked pictures of his wife, now judge. There are meetings where all 3 attend.

3 consenting adults, what is the problem?


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4765
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:04 am
 


$1:
"My behaviour was disgraceful,"
Real lawyer will never say this :)


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:05 am
 


Brenda Brenda:
So, let me get this straight. A man (lawyer) has a client, whom he sends naked pictures of his wife, now judge. There are meetings where all 3 attend.

3 consenting adults, what is the problem?


Did you read this part?
$1:
WINNIPEG — A Manitoba lawyer said he was sorry for pressuring a client eight years ago to have sex with the lawyer's wife, now a judge, as he pleaded guilty Monday to professional misconduct.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 50938
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:10 am
 


Yeah, I did. They never had sex, so it didn't work. Fail :P


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:13 am
 


You don't think this is discreditable conduct for a lawyer?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 50938
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:25 am
 


He already paid $25k, and didn't practice for 10 months. Isn't that enough?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:34 am
 


He's suing to get the 25k back. He didn't practice because he was getting treatment. And the law society took that into account and so didn't suspend him but only reprimanded him. You think that's too much?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 50938
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:43 am
 


andyt andyt:
He's suing to get the 25k back. He didn't practice because he was getting treatment. And the law society took that into account and so didn't suspend him but only reprimanded him. You think that's too much?

Of course he is suing to get it back when the deal is broken. Duhh.

No, I think it is ok that he is reprimanded, since it went to the Society. They can not let this go. But it shouldn't have gone there, OR the deal shouldn't have been made. It is either, or, not and, and.
The guy went along with going out on "dates". I think he is being hypocrite.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 9:46 am
 


The guy isn't a hypocrite. He's was trying to get a lot more money out of them, but his lawsuit was dismissed. He doesn't deserve any sympathy.

But I'm glad the law society did hear about this case.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 New York Rangers
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11240
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 10:59 am
 


They guy is still a sleaze.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 50938
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 11:02 am
 


GreenTiger GreenTiger:
They guy is still a sleaze.

They both are. I don't know how much the woman was involved, other than that he sent pics of her without her knowing, and as his wife, so I will assume she wasn't knowingly involved. But both men were.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 11:05 am
 


Brenda Brenda:
GreenTiger GreenTiger:
They guy is still a sleaze.

They both are. I don't know how much the woman was involved, other than that he sent pics of her without her knowing, and as his wife, so I will assume she wasn't knowingly involved. But both men were.


She did go to the meeting, so she was involved at some level. Supposedly just to make her husband happy. But, since she had no relationship with the 'victim' she didn't do anything wrong, tho she's still being investigated herself.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.