CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 5:02 am
 


Title: Cop on trial for assault says he used proper force
Category: Law & Order
Posted By: Hyack
Date: 2010-10-20 22:52:27
Canadian


Offline
Forum Junkie
Forum Junkie
Profile
Posts: 579
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 5:02 am
 


I would bet everything I own that the cop is lieing, I bet he was drunker than he says and I bet he put the boots to the paper deliver man.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite


GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 2424
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 5:47 am
 


CrazyNewfie CrazyNewfie:
I would bet everything I own that the cop is lieing, I bet he was drunker than he says and I bet he put the boots to the paper deliver man.

I bet the other guy is too, makes your case a lot better when you argue you have not been able to recover even after 2 years, adding a few things to the list of what he didn't shouldn't be a challenge.


Last edited by jeff744 on Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:03 am, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 50938
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 5:56 am
 


He used "proper force, in accordance to his training."
Nice. But he was not on duty, so there was no need to use any force. If he was a trained Karate-Ka, would that be "proper force, in accordance to his training" too?

I have a real hard time with this one, although I think the victims "I still have nightmares every night" is a bit over the top...


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 35270
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:00 am
 


Doesn't matter how drunk he was.
Was there sufficient reasons to arrest the guy, and did he use "proper force"?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15681
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:08 am
 


It all sounds very dodgy.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4235
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:13 am
 


Any clarification into why they got into a tussle in the first place ?


Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 9914
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:14 am
 


I'd like to hear what started it all. They came to a buddies "rescue" by the sound of things, but they haven't explained why the buddy and the news paper dude were having an issue in the first place. They don't explain clearly what was going on at the scene when the cop arrived either. Was the news paper guy taking it to his buddy? Was his buddy crap kicking the news paper guy? Tough to get a clear picture with what is said here.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15681
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:22 am
 


There must be enough to charge which says it all for me.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 35270
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:29 am
 


$1:
West Vancouver Const. Griffin Gillan, who has already pleaded guilty to assaulting Khan, testified he has no memory of beating the man until Klassen and the other off-duty officer, Delta police Const. Blair Tanino, joined him.

The "pleaded guilty" part kinda says it all, at least for Gillan.
Klassen came in later.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 50938
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:44 am
 


EyeBrock EyeBrock:
There must be enough to charge which says it all for me.

How does that work, EB, when you are off duty, and you see something happen (whether it's a co-worker or not), should you butt in and do what this guy did and use "proper force" or should you just call your collegues (like we should all call the cops instead of beating someone up...)


Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 9914
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:44 am
 


Hu, didn't see that.

Yeah, why would he have to restrain Khan if the other dude was giving him an ass whoopin.

(mind you, it could have been because of that hair dye job Khan is sporting....It looks so ..."natural".... 8O )


Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 9914
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:47 am
 


Brenda Brenda:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
There must be enough to charge which says it all for me.

How does that work, EB, when you are off duty, and you see something happen (whether it's a co-worker or not), should you butt in and do what this guy did and use "proper force" or should you just call your collegues (like we should all call the cops instead of beating someone up...)

A cop is never really "off duty". If they see a crime or disturbance, I believe they are obligated to get involved, buddy or not. If he's had a snoot full, better judgement would be to call in on duty cops immediately, but if he perceived the threat as urgent, I think he has to get involved.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 50938
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:49 am
 


Even when drunk?
I mean, if a cop is never really off duty, then he should never be drunk either...


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 8:44 am
 


The testimony so far is that Kahn was delivering newspapers, Klassen asked him for directions and Kahn said wait until I drop off these papers, at which point Klassen attecked him. Also, at least one of the cops was heard to say "we don't like brown people" tho it could not be identified who. The independent witnesses all confirm that Klassen attacked Kahn. When a rookie, on duty cop, a former trainee of Klassen's in the use of force, arrived, he first arrested Kahn. When the independent witnesses came forward, that changed to arresting the 3 cops. So while Kahn may be trying to milk the system for any civil law suit, it's the dickhead cops that should be dismissed from their forces. One of them was so drunk he kicked his own buddy in the face. We don't need racist bullies like these guys on our police forces.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  1  2  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.