[Newsbot]

Title: No right to lawyer during questioning, SCC rules
Category: Law & Order
Posted By: DerbyX
Date: 2010-10-08 11:19:25
Canadian

[TuavDan]

Am I understanding this correctly? Any one being questioned, just has to say "nothing!" On the other hand, I see alot of people being "convicted of crimes" they didn't committe (because of their lack of Legal knowledge).

[Guy_Fawkes]

TuavDan TuavDan:

Am I understanding this correctly? Any one being questioned, just has to say "nothing!" On the other hand, I see alot of people being "convicted of crimes" they didn't committe (because of their lack of Legal knowledge).

Like when?

[digerdick]

there are literally hundreds of cases,in Canada and the US of people who have been falsely accused and convicted .

perhaps you should do a little research so you have the ability to understand how important this is.

Instead of just getting your panties in a knot and calling people cop haters.

But perhaps maybe that's all you know how to do.

[Guy_Fawkes]

diggerdick diggerdick:

there are literally hundreds of cases,in Canada and the US of people who have been falsely accused and convicted .

perhaps you should do a little research so you have the ability to understand how important this is.

Instead of just getting your panties in a knot and calling people cop haters.

But perhaps maybe that's all you know how to do.

I wonder if you're premature in all aspects of your life not just on this forum.

I never said people have not been wrongly accused or convicted, only asked for an example of where someone was wrongfully convicted due to their ignorance of the legal system.

Now I am sure there may be one or two innocent people who have elected to defend themselves, but that is because of their own stupidity.

Also I am not the one making the claim, only asking for evidence, so I really the burden of proof is not with me.

Troll on quickie dick troll on