CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 5:22 pm
 


Title: Ignatieff unveils $1-billion homecare plan
Category: Political
Posted By: wildrosegirl
Date: 2010-10-05 17:19:50
Canadian


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 5321
PostPosted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 5:22 pm
 


BAHAHA Here is that nanny state Zip has been talking about ROTFL


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33691
PostPosted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 11:23 pm
 


spend baby spend.

At least the lefties are proud to show it.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
Profile
Posts: 2944
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 12:51 am
 


The national debt represents an inablitity to pay for the social programs we already have in place, an unwillingness to pay for them.

The strategy of borrowing on top of the current deficit to pay for additional home care means he doesn't think he can win the vote on his own appeal. Rather he has to borrow money, power, from the next generation. This has been going on in Ottawa for some decades.

He has no realistic plan, is basically endorsing Harper with this muse.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Edmonton Oilers
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 8533
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 5:55 am
 


Bruce_the_vii Bruce_the_vii:
The national debt represents an inablitity to pay for the social programs we already have in place, an unwillingness to pay for them.

The strategy of borrowing on top of the current deficit to pay for additional home care means he doesn't think he can win the vote on his own appeal. Rather he has to borrow money, power, from the next generation. This has been going on in Ottawa for some decades.

He has no realistic plan, is basically endorsing Harper with this muse.


We can pay for 9 years of this if we toss Harper's prison building spree.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 12349
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:27 am
 


Bruce_the_vii Bruce_the_vii:
The national debt represents an inablitity to pay for the social programs we already have in place, an unwillingness to pay for them.

The strategy of borrowing on top of the current deficit to pay for additional home care means he doesn't think he can win the vote on his own appeal. Rather he has to borrow money, power, from the next generation. This has been going on in Ottawa for some decades.

He has no realistic plan, is basically endorsing Harper with this muse.


The national debt hasn't come from "social programs". We have lots of money to fund our social programs. The debt comes from public funding of waste and bureaucracy. We could have conquered that in the 90s but made irresponsible use of our budget surpluses. Our most recent additions to debt aren't from funding social programs either, but from ill-advised bailout-stimulus spending.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
Profile
Posts: 2944
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 3:30 pm
 


Another way of wording the budget and deficit is the "government's load". That includes social programs. In any case the world around governments have over spent - failed to carry their responsibilities.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
Profile
Posts: 4183
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:27 pm
 


seems like a reasonable debate between the libs and cons, ie tax cuts vs social spending. I will watch it for a while to see which way makes most sense.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Edmonton Oilers
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 8533
PostPosted: Wed Oct 06, 2010 7:16 pm
 


ASLplease ASLplease:
seems like a reasonable debate between the libs and cons, ie tax cuts vs social spending. I will watch it for a while to see which way makes most sense.


Yea, because the Conservatives haven't spent a dime. :roll:

More like crime and punishment spending (with emphasis on the punishment) versus social spending. Appeals to fear versus appeals to better nature and compassion.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
Profile
Posts: 2944
PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 1:56 am
 


Yeah, they both believe in more spending despite the deficit. The prison purchase could have been put off, they will now cost twice as much because of the interest charges on the borrowing. This guy Harper needs some better ideas to run with.


I saw an American economists on TV explain the ins and outs of deficit funding one day. He said deficits were basically good because they kept the politicians from more spending even more. This turns out to be a pretty smart philosophical answer.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11813
PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:52 am
 


Announced same day as Harper announces $155 million prison expansion plan. And what's the response?
Waaaahhhh!!!! Nanny-state blah blah blah. We'd rather have Uncle Jackboot state!


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.