CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:28 am
 


Title: $16 billion for new fighter aircraft, ships
Category: Military
Posted By: Hyack
Date: 2010-07-13 00:54:52
Canadian


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4117
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:28 am
 


Anybody want to take any wagers on whats going to happen to these plans?

My wager is that they scrap the idea of buying more Fighter Jets or atleast the Joint Strike Fighter and go with something with a cheaper price tag. Though I doubt they will scrap the idea of the Joint Support Ship purchase. After recent events, its quite clear some are required.


Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 19986
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:54 am
 


$16 Billion for replacement fighters and support ships is great, but when are they going to get up off their collective asses and address the issue of the Heavy nuclear powered icebreakers we need to support our claims in the Arctic?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23103
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 12:31 pm
 


$1:
The Harper government is gearing up for more multibillion-dollar announcements on military equipment spending: one for a controversial purchase of new fighter aircraft, the other a re-announcement of a project that was derailed two years ago.


The key words in that paragraph are "announcement". Just more of the same old, same old from the current government (a favourite trick of the former Liberal governemnt too); announce projects and then never get around to paying for them.

Money talks and BS walks Mr. Harper.

Which is it? More bullshit press conferences or paying for real capability? Sadly, history dictates it will be more BS and less cash.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23103
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 12:39 pm
 


Hyack Hyack:
$16 Billion for replacement fighters and support ships is great, but when are they going to get up off their collective asses and address the issue of the Heavy nuclear powered icebreakers we need to support our claims in the Arctic?


Oh you didn't hear? We're building one (not the three he originally promised), which will be unarmed and ready in about 2017.

http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?id=2258

$1:
CCGS John G. Diefenbaker is the name for a Canadian Coast Guard icebreaker that is expected to join the fleet in 2017.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CCGS_John_G._Diefenbaker

As for the 'Arctic Patrol Vessels' (AKA slushbreakers) he promised in 2007, well, that's on hold altogether...

$1:
The federal government has put off asking shipbuilders for ideas on the construction of a flotilla of Arctic patrol boats, a sign that the two-year-old program is in trouble.

The navy's project management office advised the defence industry on June 10th that the long-anticipated letters of intent had been delayed.

"The extent of the delay is unknown at this time," said the note obtained by The Canadian Press.


http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/s ... 6/20090616

So much for 'Canada First'...


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Boston Bruins


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11907
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 12:41 pm
 


bootlegga bootlegga:
The key words in that paragraph are "announcement". Just more of the same old, same old from the current government (a favourite trick of the former Liberal governemnt too); announce projects and then never get around to paying for them.

Money talks and BS walks Mr. Harper.

Which is it? More bullshit press conferences or paying for real capability? Sadly, history dictates it will be more BS and less cash.


And for this I place the blame fully on the Canadian public. We seem to want a strong proud military but we don't want to pony up the cash. Apparently a cradle to the grave welfare system is more important than a stron defence force.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15681
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 12:44 pm
 


I thought all this had been announced before?

Did the government think we wouldn't notice? Come on guys, just buy the stuff and stop telling us you are going to buy it.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 6584
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 1:08 pm
 


Why not buy flammable old cruisers from GB ?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23103
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 1:10 pm
 


2Cdo 2Cdo:
bootlegga bootlegga:
The key words in that paragraph are "announcement". Just more of the same old, same old from the current government (a favourite trick of the former Liberal governemnt too); announce projects and then never get around to paying for them.

Money talks and BS walks Mr. Harper.

Which is it? More bullshit press conferences or paying for real capability? Sadly, history dictates it will be more BS and less cash.


And for this I place the blame fully on the Canadian public. We seem to want a strong proud military but we don't want to pony up the cash. Apparently a cradle to the grave welfare system is more important than a stron defence force.


I agree, and we get the government we elect don't we? Canadians only seem to want to spend money on defence when there's a real threat, which is short-sighted and foolish, but that's the hand we've been dealt with. The problem is that the electorate lets politicians (of all stripes) get away with this nonsense of repeating announcements, so why should they ever change?

I honestly thought Harper would be different than the previous Liberal governments, but as far as I can see, his policy is the same as the Libs was, promise just enough to make it look like you're actually doing something, coupled with re-announce the program over and over and over so it looks like you're a big spender when you're really not. Sure, he's made a few splashy purchases (like the C-17s) but isn't that exactly what the Libs did, go out and spend a few billion to buy fighters or frigates every few years and ignore the military the rest of the time?


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 1:25 pm
 


$16 billion in Zimbabwe currency buys you how much? :wink:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 New York Rangers
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11240
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 1:29 pm
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
$16 billion in Zimbabwe currency buys you how much? :wink:

A pencil if your lucky.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 1:35 pm
 


Here's the ice breaker that the CF will be able to afford once their $16b budget gets knocked down by the pols...

Image

The stand is included but the batteries are extra. :wink:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 New York Rangers
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11240
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 1:56 pm
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Here's the ice breaker that the CF will be able to afford once their $16b budget gets knocked down by the pols...

Image

The stand is included but the batteries are extra. :wink:


If these are the shadows of things yet to come Canada will be making a bunch of take out deliveries to the Chines PLAN ships as the collect their 20%.

No they won't. Canadians are our friends. We will have the opportunity to oblige the Chinese who want to die for their country.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Calgary Flames


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4039
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 3:37 pm
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Here's the ice breaker that the CF will be able to afford once their $16b budget gets knocked down by the pols...

Image

The stand is included but the batteries are extra. :wink:


That chopper on the landing pad looks rather pricey. Can we haggle over this?

-J.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Ottawa Senators


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 17037
PostPosted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 8:49 pm
 


Where are we going to get the money for this stuff? Am I the only one who sees a repeat of the 90's happening? Runaway Conservative spending that will no doubt need to be reined in by the Liberals. It's not a sound policy that we're spending all this money that we don't really have, and we're lowering taxes to boot. This will NOT end well for us if we're not careful...


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  1  2  3  4  5  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.