| |
Posts: 3915
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:15 am
Wow...is this the same thing as the poles flipping?
|
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:19 am
Days are supposed to get longer this time of year, who do I write to get this time back? It adds up over a year and I want it back. All joking aside, between the Hati Quake, the one in Chile and Japan last week, I'm sure there are bigger worries than microseconds on the world clock.
|
Posts: 11362
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 5:11 pm
Crap, I already lack enough time and now this?? 
|
Posts: 4039
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:41 pm
The axis' tilt is so bad now, as I'm writing this reply me and my computer table are sliding out the balcony door.... -J.
|
Posts: 6584
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:51 pm
I'm writing this message, I click "Submit" and it tells me I have already sent the message.
|
Posts: 42160
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:05 pm
see it shortened time so much we're actually going .sdrawkcab
|
Posts: 6584
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:16 pm
It shortened the day by about 1.26 microseconds. So, every 9.19 days, we loose one second.
They will need to adjust the GPS satellites ! Without the ajustment due to relativity in the GPS (yes, Einstein), the positioning would be off 10km/day and it's only 7 microseconds/day difference.
|
Posts: 12398
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:41 pm
Proculation Proculation: It shortened the day by about 1.26 microseconds. So, every 9.19 days, we loose one second.
They will need to adjust the GPS satellites ! Without the ajustment due to relativity in the GPS (yes, Einstein), the positioning would be off 10km/day and it's only 7 microseconds/day difference. Wouldn't that be shorter by 1 second every 793650.793 days? The axis has also supposed to have shifted 3".
|
Posts: 6584
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:52 pm
PluggyRug PluggyRug: Proculation Proculation: It shortened the day by about 1.26 microseconds. So, every 9.19 days, we loose one second.
They will need to adjust the GPS satellites ! Without the ajustment due to relativity in the GPS (yes, Einstein), the positioning would be off 10km/day and it's only 7 microseconds/day difference. Wouldn't that be shorter by 1 second every 793650.793 days? The axis has also supposed to have shifted 3". 1/1.26 microseconds gives 793650.793 seconds^-1 That means that every 793650.793 seconds, we get 1. Since the unit is a "second", we get a second every 793650.793 seconds which is 9.19 days (793650.793 / 3600 (hours) / 24 )
|
Posts: 12398
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:04 pm
Proculation Proculation: PluggyRug PluggyRug: Proculation Proculation: It shortened the day by about 1.26 microseconds. So, every 9.19 days, we loose one second.
They will need to adjust the GPS satellites ! Without the ajustment due to relativity in the GPS (yes, Einstein), the positioning would be off 10km/day and it's only 7 microseconds/day difference. Wouldn't that be shorter by 1 second every 793650.793 days? The axis has also supposed to have shifted 3". 1/1.26 microseconds gives 793650.793 seconds^-1 That means that every 793650.793 seconds, we get 1. Since the unit is a "second", we get a second every 793650.793 seconds which is 9.19 days (793650.793 / 3600 (hours) / 24 ) But if it's 1.26 microseconds per day, then it would it not take ~793650 days to accumulate one second, or 1,000,000/1.26?
|
Posts: 1211
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:27 pm
Last edited by djakeydd on Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Posts: 6584
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:34 pm
the "per day" statement is only a reference.
See it like this:
Every (3600 * 24 = 86400) 86400 seconds, 1.26 microseconds is lost. That means that: 0.000 001 26 is lost every 86 400 seconds.
Multiply those two numbers, you get 0,108864 days^-1 Make that 1/0,108864, it gives 9,185773075 days.
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 13 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests |
|
|