CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:25 am
 


Title: Canada discussed buying Ambassador bridge
Category: Political
Posted By: stokes
Date: 2010-02-09 06:27:12
Canadian


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7835
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:25 am
 


Why don't they just let him build the bridge he half started to begin with? Seriously, he's already built the ramp that would connect the city to the bridge, bought off a shitload of properties on the Canadian side, including one very large apartment complex, and is more than willing to pay. Sigh.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:19 am
 


The billionaire chap can certainly own the bridge, but unless he bends to the wishes of Canada there's no reason why Canada has to leave the approaches to it open. Close the approaches and end his revenue stream and he'll come back to the table to discuss matters in a more reasonable attitude.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14139
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:14 am
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
The billionaire chap can certainly own the bridge, but unless he bends to the wishes of Canada there's no reason why Canada has to leave the approaches to it open. Close the approaches and end his revenue stream and he'll come back to the table to discuss matters in a more reasonable attitude.


Considering this is one of the BUSIEST commercial border crossings on the planet, that would only serve to hurt Canadian interests. I say ramp up the taxes on the part of the bridge that is in Canada. IF Mr Billionaire don't wanna sell it, we can still make him pay for it ;-)

As for the second bridge idea, I won't hold my breath. Been hearing about a second bridge for over 20 years now.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:20 am
 


PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
Considering this is one of the BUSIEST commercial border crossings on the planet, that would only serve to hurt Canadian interests. I say ramp up the taxes on the part of the bridge that is in Canada. IF Mr Billionaire don't wanna sell it, we can still make him pay for it ;-)

As for the second bridge idea, I won't hold my breath. Been hearing about a second bridge for over 20 years now.


Forgive me, but I don't see why a sovereign nation needs the permission of a foreign geriatric Scrooge in order to build a bridge. If the old ba$tard won't budge then have your PM call up Obama and ask a favor.

It's moments like this when I am sure Canada misses the relationship that Mulroney and Reagan had. Mulroney could've called Reagan on his personal line and Reagan would've got it handled.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14139
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:57 am
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
Considering this is one of the BUSIEST commercial border crossings on the planet, that would only serve to hurt Canadian interests. I say ramp up the taxes on the part of the bridge that is in Canada. IF Mr Billionaire don't wanna sell it, we can still make him pay for it ;-)

As for the second bridge idea, I won't hold my breath. Been hearing about a second bridge for over 20 years now.


Forgive me, but I don't see why a sovereign nation needs the permission of a foreign geriatric Scrooge in order to build a bridge. If the old ba$tard won't budge then have your PM call up Obama and ask a favor.

It's moments like this when I am sure Canada misses the relationship that Mulroney and Reagan had. Mulroney could've called Reagan on his personal line and Reagan would've got it handled.


The second bridge hold up actually has little to do with the Scrooge( nicely put btw :lol: ) When it comes to Windsor, all 3 levels of government have a nasty habit of twiddling their thumbs when it comes to doing anything for and with Windsor. It's like the bastard son of Canada that went to live with American relatives :lol:



And slightly off topic but we had a joke up here when Mulroney was PM.
What's 9 inches long and hangs between Bush Sr's legs?
Brian Mulroney's tie. :lol:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 New York Rangers
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11240
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:50 pm
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
The billionaire chap can certainly own the bridge, but unless he bends to the wishes of Canada there's no reason why Canada has to leave the approaches to it open. Close the approaches and end his revenue stream and he'll come back to the table to discuss matters in a more reasonable attitude.


The billionaire dude is just a greedy pig, he needs a swift kick in the groin.

I think your idea of Canada closing the approaches and choking
this guy revenue stream is a good idea. It's a shame though that
that the Reagan-Mulroney relationship between the governments has faded otherwise a few phone calls and a little White House
"encouragement" would solve this problem.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.