CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 12:38 am
 


Title: Will California become America's first failed state?
Category: Uncle Sam
Posted By: xerxes
Date: 2009-10-03 22:20:40


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4117
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 12:38 am
 


Well the first thing that went wrong is constantly electing actors as politicians. Problem solved?


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 35283
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 12:59 am
 


It's over stretched and it has a ridiculous set up for passing budgets so it is held hostage by a minority with a two-thirds vote. Something HAS to give and I don't think it will be the Republicans, ever. They would rather the state fall apart and the state might have to split up as a result. Taxes MUST go up as there has been far to much growth and not nearly enough investment ergo living beyond their means has caught up to them. However, the only fix is what Arnold tried to do and the people said no to every option. They wanted this bed now they get to lie in it.

Who knows, maybe bill 390 will pass because of this.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11362
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:15 am
 


Scape Scape:
It's over stretched and it has a ridiculous set up for passing budgets so it is held hostage by a minority with a two-thirds vote. Something HAS to give and I don't think it will be the Republicans, ever. They would rather the state fall apart and the state might have to split up as a result. Taxes MUST go up as there has been far to much growth and not nearly enough investment ergo living beyond their means has caught up to them. However, the only fix is what Arnold tried to do and the people said no to every option. They wanted this bed now they get to lie in it.

Who knows, maybe bill 390 will pass because of this.


Yup. The best example of how not to do Direct Democracy and the folly of Rigid Limitations on Government. If you give the Electorate the Power to Demand Services, you can't take away the Governments Power to raise Funds(aka Taxes/Fees) to cover those Services.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1098
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:56 am
 


Some of them illegals, many of them non-anglos, all poor - not the people the middle class legislators think about when debating the budget.

$1:
Outside the Forum in Inglewood, near downtown Los Angeles, California has already failed. The scene is reminiscent of the fallout from Hurricane Katrina, as crowds of impoverished citizens stand or lie aimlessly on the hot tarmac of the centre's car park. It is 10am, and most have already been here for hours. They have come for free healthcare: a travelling medical and dental clinic has set up shop in the Forum (which usually hosts rock concerts) and thousands of the poor, the uninsured and the down-on-their-luck have driven for miles to be here.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 50938
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:10 am
 


Bacardi4206 Bacardi4206:
Well the first thing that went wrong is constantly electing actors as politicians. Problem solved?

But he married a Kennedy!


:P


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1098
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:43 am
 


Brenda Brenda:
Bacardi4206 Bacardi4206:
Well the first thing that went wrong is constantly electing actors as politicians. Problem solved?

But he married a Kennedy!


:P


And became a RINO. :x


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 21611
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 9:16 am
 


:|


Last edited by Public_Domain on Sat Feb 22, 2025 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 19954
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 9:23 am
 


Pardon me for saying this, but California is being forced into the hole they're in because there is too much democracy.

With the ease of getting ballot initiatives on the ballot and with such a low threshold to recall a politician, this was bound to happen. I understand the historical and political reasons California is the way it is, but, I'm sure you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who doesn't think it's ridiculous to run a state this way.

$1:
Even in countries where the mechanisms (of democracy) date from a century-old tradition, there comes a solemn hour when one no longer asks the people anything, because one knows the response would be disastrous.... Can one imagine a war being declared by referendum? A referendum is a very
good thing if it is a matter of choosing the most suitable site for a village fountain, but when the most important interests of a people arc at stake, even ultra-democratic governments take great care not to entrust those interests to the judgment of the people themselves....


-Mussolini (Apologies for quoting a fascist pig)


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 35283
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 12:37 pm
 


California is manageable but they have ended up on the rocks and need this crisis to get them to focus. This will sort itself out but the current setup is untenable. They might consider a north/south split.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 12349
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:24 pm
 


Republican policy at its finest. Cut essential services to reduce taxes and buy votes. Then OOOOOPPPPS, I guess we need to hire back all those forest-fire fighters we didn't think we needed. Oh wait, how are we going to pay them?

If you want to trim government spending, you have to pick the right places to cut. If you get it wrong, as the Governator has, you'd better have a contingency. Say it in your best Austrian accent: "What's a contingency?"


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1240
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:32 pm
 


Lemmy Lemmy:
Republican policy at its finest. Cut essential services to reduce taxes and buy votes. Then OOOOOPPPPS, I guess we need to hire back all those forest-fire fighters we didn't think we needed. Oh wait, how are we going to pay them?

If you want to trim government spending, you have to pick the right places to cut. If you get it wrong, as the Governator has, you'd better have a contingency. Say it in your best Austrian accent: "What's a contingency?"


To say California's problems are because of one party or another is bull. State budget does not fund firefighters. They do have the emergency fund for the wildfires though. Neither side was willing to contribute (it was a nonissue in the budget) for it.

California has a structural problem. Spending requires only a majority vote. Tax raising requires 2/3 of the vote. Sure, Califoria got around that with fees, but even then, the population passed things like Prop 13 to stop spending. So you have this horriable mess where the legislature can only control 3/4 of the money and the rest is mandated through ballot initiatives.

Quite sad to see, but they have done this to themselves. And no amount of financial assistance is going to change that.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 19954
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:37 pm
 


Hear hear. Honestly, the only way it looks like things will change in California is if the politicians there grow some balls (not gonna happen) or they rip up the state's constitution and start from scratch and create a framework that's more manageable.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1240
PostPosted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:44 pm
 


xerxes xerxes:
Hear hear. Honestly, the only way it looks like things will change in California is if the politicians there grow some balls (not gonna happen) or they rip up the state's constitution and start from scratch and create a framework that's more manageable.


They really do need to start fresh. Changing the voting for taxes down to 50% will help. As much as I think the constant tax raises is ultimatly bad for the state, running deficits is much worse.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.