Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy:
Not withstanding the fact that this involves a white man, i'm pretty sure that despite whites being targeted by black criminals, there are alot of wealthy black's in South Africa that suffer the same fate.
A) There are more wealthy whites than blacks in SA, B) Black person wouldn't be called a "white dog" or a "settler" which is what he based his case off of.
Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy:
Since this is more of an economic problem, I think we've opened the gates up to anyone from South Africa, black or white who's been targeted by crime and I agree with the Brit's about an influx of white refugees after this ruling, but I don't think it'll stop with whites, we're gonna see every colour under the rainbow applying for refugee status, based on their history of being victims of crime.
Every colour under the rainbow already apply for refugee status, only thing that has changed is now whites can apply where as before they were pretty much the only group that couldn't. Also remember he was able to prove that it was his race that made him a target
$1:
Brandon Huntley, 31, from Cape Town, said he had been stabbed three times by black robbers, who called him a 'white dog' and a 'settler' - a reference to South Africa's colonial past based on racial apartheid.
Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy:
Once again the immigration board has screwed up big time and set a precident that'll be impossible to overturn without a giant hue and cry from every other country in the world.
We can simply slap a visa requirement on SA. The only "precedent" is that the immigration board recognized that it IS possible for whites to be the target of racial discrimination. This ruling is no different than thousands and thousands of other rulings.
Seems to me you do not like the idea of a white person getting refugee status. Which I am sure many people on the Left side of our political system do not like either