$1:
* Provide more details about improving the employment insurance system before the House of Commons votes on budget estimates at the end of the week. The government has said it will introduce unspecified new EI proposals in the fall.
Huh? I don't think the government can come up with a detailed and sustainable plan by friday, unless they already have soemthign in the works.
$1:
* Give more information about the rate of stimulus spending than included in last Thursday's progress report.
As I said in another thread, even just having project status listed in addition to what projects are recieving money would help in this area alot. Would give people an idea of whether a project has started or not, or how far along the construction process it is if it's already under construction. More specific details about the total budget of a project, rather than the scale currently used; < 100 000, 100 000 - 1 000 000, 1 000 000 - 5 000 000, > 5 000 000, in addition to the amount of money out of that budget already paid out towards the construction of a project.
None of what I suggested above should be hard to implement at all, and would provide an incredible amount of transparency.
$1:
* Show more details on the government's plan to contain the ballooning deficit, instead of offering what Ignatieff called "rosy projections."
Government should already have a more detailed plan that they can provide upon request.
$1:
* Provide clearer answers on the government's plan to deal with Canada's medical isotopes shortage.
If there is a plan, they should be able to provide it by Friday. If there isn't a plan that can be provided by friday, then it shows the government's irresponsibility
with regards to the issue.
So 3 demands I agree with, one I don't (and frankly I don't know much about the issue anyways). Not a bad rep so far. I hope that if these issues are resolved that Iggy continues to act as a responsible opposition leader.