CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:32 am
 


Title: PM expects opposition to 'parrot' critics of anti-gang measures
Category: Political
Posted By: Hyack
Date: 2009-02-26 13:39:03
Canadian


Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 69
PostPosted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:32 am
 


There should also be a sentence for any persons who are affiliated with a gang


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23092
PostPosted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:24 am
 


Nobody is really 'soft on crime', as Harper puts it, as no one wants to be stabbed, robbed or raped. The fundamental difference is in punishment. Some believe in chopping off hands for theft, others believe that the death penalty deters murders, and others believe in long term rehabilitation for serious offenders.

I of the opinion that people who commit serious crimes (murder, rape, child molestation, violent armed robbery, etc) should simply be locked up for the rest of their lives in a military style prison. The CF runs a very nasty prison with a recidivism rate of less than 1%, compared to the federal penitenary system's 20+%. For those whose crimes aren't beyond the pale (like assault or robbery), parole could be given, but murderers and rapists and other bastards should never receive parole.


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
 Toronto Maple Leafs
Profile
Posts: 1094
PostPosted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:41 am
 


Velcro Velcro:
There should also be a sentence for any persons who are affiliated with a gang


Be carefull what you say around here and don't leave yourself so wide open.

I am to understand by your comment that people should lose their ability to assemble for fear it would be considered a gang or club?


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
Profile
Posts: 356
PostPosted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 9:25 am
 


The "tough on crime" approach to minimum sentences etc. is rather misdirected. The criminal has to be caught first, so if his/her chances of getting caught are not any different from before, then there is NO real deterrence. Not only that, there needs to be sufficient evidence to prosecute and some have got off on that score.
More serious "time" means more not guilty pleas and more trials. With a limited number of prosecutors as well as limited funds that is also an problem, so the result will be more plea bargains down to a lesser charge without a minimum sentence. Moreover even if such charges get to a jury they will be in some cases more reluctant to vote guilty in a less than super clearcut case because of the minimum sentence.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.