|
Posts: 23084
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 11:45 am
$1: He once denounced Joe Clark for losing his 1979 minority on the basis of a gasoline tax that the Tory leader had not campaigned on. “You can be principled without being stupid,” Mr. Harper said of Mr. Clark. But last week Mr. Harper proceeded to do a similar thing.
What a hypocrite!
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 11:47 am
bootlegga bootlegga: $1: He once denounced Joe Clark for losing his 1979 minority on the basis of a gasoline tax that the Tory leader had not campaigned on. “You can be principled without being stupid,” Mr. Harper said of Mr. Clark. But last week Mr. Harper proceeded to do a similar thing. What a hypocrite! wheres that letter?
|
Posts: 8533
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 11:57 am
bootlegga bootlegga: $1: He once denounced Joe Clark for losing his 1979 minority on the basis of a gasoline tax that the Tory leader had not campaigned on. “You can be principled without being stupid,” Mr. Harper said of Mr. Clark. But last week Mr. Harper proceeded to do a similar thing. What a hypocrite! Nah, he just fell into the trap that all bullies fall into - figuring that they can get away with it forever. On this, he was cocky and arrogant before hypocritical. It pleases me to no end that he's being nailed to his own cross. The only question now is: what will he do to stop the vote on Monday?
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:03 pm
hurley_108 hurley_108: bootlegga bootlegga: $1: He once denounced Joe Clark for losing his 1979 minority on the basis of a gasoline tax that the Tory leader had not campaigned on. “You can be principled without being stupid,” Mr. Harper said of Mr. Clark. But last week Mr. Harper proceeded to do a similar thing. What a hypocrite! Nah, he just fell into the trap that all bullies fall into - figuring that they can get away with it forever. On this, he was cocky and arrogant before hypocritical. It pleases me to no end that he's being nailed to his own cross. The only question now is: what will he do to stop the vote on Monday? ...the constitution says it's within his power to suspend parliament just like the constitution says the other parties can ask to form a coalition. So don't cry if he does. I know you won't read this mullet boy 
|
Posts: 23084
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:07 pm
mtbr mtbr: ...the constitution says it's within his power to suspend parliament just like the constitution says the other parties can ask to form a coalition.
Suspend Parliament? What's next, a fire in the Reichstag, oops, I mean Parliament? Jesus Christ...
|
Posts: 8533
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:07 pm
$1: This post was made by mtbrain who is currently on your ignore list. There it is again; that vaguely annoying, but still utterly inconsequential, buzzing noise....
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:08 pm
bootlegga bootlegga: mtbr mtbr: ...the constitution says it's within his power to suspend parliament just like the constitution says the other parties can ask to form a coalition.
Suspend Parliament? What's next, a fire in the Reichstag, oops, I mean Parliament? Jesus Christ... look it up it's already been discussed and it's in his power to do so.
|
Posts: 8533
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:09 pm
bootlegga bootlegga: Suspend Parliament?
What's next, a fire in the Reichstag, oops, I mean Parliament? Jesus Christ... Damnitt! You owe me a new monitor! I just snorted Pepsi all over mine!
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:13 pm
bootlegga bootlegga: $1: He once denounced Joe Clark for losing his 1979 minority on the basis of a gasoline tax that the Tory leader had not campaigned on. “You can be principled without being stupid,” Mr. Harper said of Mr. Clark. But last week Mr. Harper proceeded to do a similar thing. What a hypocrite! I think Joe had the burden of the nafta and gst on his shoulders when he took power,it wasnt popular and he took the hit for it. Didnt the libs drag someone from intensive care in to help vote him out also or was it a guy in a wheelchair? Joe was also respected in the house of commons by all members.
|
Posts: 42160
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:18 pm
$1: I think Joe had the burden of the nafta and gst on his shoulders when he took power NAFTA came into play with Mulroney and the GST didn't come to life until January 1991
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:26 pm
ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog: $1: I think Joe had the burden of the nafta and gst on his shoulders when he took power NAFTA came into play with Mulroney and the GST didn't come to life until January 1991 Right,It was Mulroney. http://home.ca.inter.net/~grantsky/clark.htmlThat's why I voted for Cretian back then.
|
Posts: 8533
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:28 pm
bootlegga bootlegga: mtbr mtbr: ...the constitution says it's within his power to suspend parliament just like the constitution says the other parties can ask to form a coalition.
Suspend Parliament? In seriousness, I almost hope he does. He'll have to come to a vote sometime, be it on Monday or in January or in February, as he won't be able to do anything unless he does. The harder he fights, and the more tricks he pulls to delay the vote, the greater the credibility of the coalition becomes.
|
Posts: 4914
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:31 pm
there will be no coalition government, we will just have another election.
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 12:32 pm
hurley_108 hurley_108: bootlegga bootlegga: mtbr mtbr: ...the constitution says it's within his power to suspend parliament just like the constitution says the other parties can ask to form a coalition.
Suspend Parliament? In seriousness, I almost hope he does. He'll have to come to a vote sometime, be it on Monday or in January or in February, as he won't be able to do anything unless he does. The harder he fights, and the more tricks he pulls to delay the vote, the greater the credibility of the coalition becomes. When there's a full budget on the table that reflects the decisions made in Obamas plan and the CCC votes it down that will look grand won't it. It'll just be further proof of a power grab.
|
|
Page 1 of 2
|
[ 28 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests |
|
|