[Newsbot]

<strong>Title: </strong> <a href="/link.php?id=29742" target="_blank">'Thousands' of troops pledged for 2010</a> (click to view)

<strong>Category:</strong> <a href="/news/topic/2-sports" target="_blank">Sports</a>
<strong>Posted By: </strong> <a href="/modules.php?name=Your_Account&op=userinfo&username=Hyack" target="_blank">Hyack</a>
<strong>Date: </strong> 2008-01-31 19:53:46
<strong>Canadian</strong>

[camerontech]

Soldiers....in our cities...


They were right! Oh NOES!!!

[sasquatch2]

This indicates the shallow planning by the boosters of these events.

Reality is a frequently neglected factor.

[kenmore]

where are they going to get them? they send most of our troups to fight the useless battle in afghanistan for the yanks.. maybe we can get some troups from Germany?? to cover the olympics in Vancouver.. I mean....Germany on Friday rejected a call from the United States to send combat troops to dangerous parts of southern Afghanistan and said there were no plans to change its deployment of troops in the less violent north.

[kenmore]

at least the Germans got their shit together.....

[sasquatch2]

Yeah well! Kenmore thinks the taliban are winning......

Bushes war? A UN/NATO mission?

Germany needs it's troops at home to deal with their domestic Taliban........

[kenmore]

well alot of people think we are fighting a losing battle.... the fact is we will not defeat the taliban... because we are fighting not only them but a religious bias as well.... so in terms of that ya they are difficult to defeat..... so sastwatch it only an opion... take a vallium