CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:54 pm
 


<strong>Title: </strong> <a href="/link.php?id=29186" target="_blank">Dion backs down from Pakistan comments</a> (click to view)

<strong>Category:</strong> <a href="/news/topic/1-political" target="_blank">Political</a>
<strong>Posted By: </strong> <a href="/modules.php?name=Your_Account&op=userinfo&username=WDHIII" target="_blank">WDHIII</a>
<strong>Date: </strong> 2008-01-18 08:10:52
<strong>Canadian</strong>





PostPosted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:54 pm
 


slowly removing the foot from the mouth


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 20460
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:00 am
 


Funny how you guys were all cheering and agreeing when it was people in bushs administartion saying the same thing. :roll:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Boston Bruins


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11907
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:11 am
 


DerbyX DerbyX:
Funny how you guys were all cheering and agreeing when it was people in bushs administartion saying the same thing. :roll:


What people are making fun of is Dion calling for a withdrawl from Afghanistan and now on return from Afghanistan he calls for a NATO intervention into a country who has on numerous occasions told NATO it is not wanted there. Advocating an expansion of the war while withdrawing forces at the same time. 8O He really should have someone proofread his comments.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 6642
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:17 am
 


I agree, although I was hoping calling for expanding the war was him also saying we should commit to staying in Afghanistan.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
Profile
Posts: 2879
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:19 am
 


DerbyX DerbyX:
Funny how you guys were all cheering and agreeing when it was people in bushs administartion saying the same thing. :roll:


but dion is also at same time saying canada should have no combat role in afghanistan , how can he come out and say NATO should take on another huge middle eastern country ?

which doesn't want nato intervention anyways , unlike afghanistan which supports outside assistance.

dion simply makes no sence and is not up to the job .





PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:20 am
 


If Dion actually had a plan for Afghanistan the smart thing to do would have been to give the details while he was there. Oops I used Dion and smart in the same sentence. :P


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
Profile
Posts: 2879
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:21 am
 


mtbr mtbr:
slowly removing the foot from the mouth



get the feeling there is going to be alot of silly dion quotes coming in the near future , we will be kept busy commenting on them all and wondering what he was saying.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 20460
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:29 am
 


2Cdo 2Cdo:
DerbyX DerbyX:
Funny how you guys were all cheering and agreeing when it was people in bushs administartion saying the same thing. :roll:


What people are making fun of is Dion calling for a withdrawl from Afghanistan and now on return from Afghanistan he calls for a NATO intervention into a country who has on numerous occasions told NATO it is not wanted there. Advocating an expansion of the war while withdrawing forces at the same time. 8O He really should have someone proofread his comments.


Thats not what his position is. His position is a withdrawl from front-line combat to a training and support position for an army and gov't that should have long ago assumed full control of the situation. In addition he quite clearly meant political clout and support rather then military intervention. You guys are just predisposed to think that what he said means military intervention.

BTW, I am curious to hear your position concerning the break of security the CPC MP made by discussing Liberal plans to visit Afghanistan in advance, a serious break of security?

This was all but dismissed by the usual suspects here but we both know that had it been the other way around then those very same people would have been calling for treason charges.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
Profile
Posts: 2879
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:35 am
 


DerbyX DerbyX:
2Cdo 2Cdo:
DerbyX DerbyX:
Funny how you guys were all cheering and agreeing when it was people in bushs administartion saying the same thing. :roll:


What people are making fun of is Dion calling for a withdrawl from Afghanistan and now on return from Afghanistan he calls for a NATO intervention into a country who has on numerous occasions told NATO it is not wanted there. Advocating an expansion of the war while withdrawing forces at the same time. 8O He really should have someone proofread his comments.


Thats not what his position is. His position is a withdrawl from front-line combat to a training and support position for an army and gov't that should have long ago assumed full control of the situation. In addition he quite clearly meant political clout and support rather then military intervention. You guys are just predisposed to think that what he said means military intervention.

BTW, I am curious to hear your position concerning the break of security the CPC MP made by discussing Liberal plans to visit Afghanistan in advance, a serious break of security?

This was all but dismissed by the usual suspects here but we both know that had it been the other way around then those very same people would have been calling for treason charges.



but the government of afghanistan isn't ready to take over the sitaution and its military is not fully ready or trained .
so how can they possibliy be expected to take over and try to control all the terrosists over there .

dion is just a wussy and trying to find a way for canada to get out of its commitment without looking like one .


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 20460
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:43 am
 


ryan29 ryan29:
DerbyX DerbyX:
2Cdo 2Cdo:
DerbyX DerbyX:
Funny how you guys were all cheering and agreeing when it was people in bushs administartion saying the same thing. :roll:


What people are making fun of is Dion calling for a withdrawl from Afghanistan and now on return from Afghanistan he calls for a NATO intervention into a country who has on numerous occasions told NATO it is not wanted there. Advocating an expansion of the war while withdrawing forces at the same time. 8O He really should have someone proofread his comments.


Thats not what his position is. His position is a withdrawl from front-line combat to a training and support position for an army and gov't that should have long ago assumed full control of the situation. In addition he quite clearly meant political clout and support rather then military intervention. You guys are just predisposed to think that what he said means military intervention.

BTW, I am curious to hear your position concerning the break of security the CPC MP made by discussing Liberal plans to visit Afghanistan in advance, a serious break of security?

This was all but dismissed by the usual suspects here but we both know that had it been the other way around then those very same people would have been calling for treason charges.



but the government of afghanistan isn't ready to take over the sitaution and its military is not fully ready or trained .
so how can they possibliy be expected to take over and try to control all the terrosists over there .

dion is just a wussy and trying to find a way for canada to get out of its commitment without looking like one .


You haven't even got a clue whats going on in Ontario so how can your judgement be even considered for anything else. It can't as your post just confirmed.

You are just looking for any reason to criticize the Liberals so your biasness invalidates your opinion much as it does the usual anti-Liberal suspects.





PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 11:51 am
 


DerbyX DerbyX:
BTW, I am curious to hear your position concerning the break of security the CPC MP made by discussing Liberal plans to visit Afghanistan in advance, a serious break of security?

.


Do you really think Dion was in danger of an attack from the Taliban. I'm sure the Taliban like Dions non-combat role, gives them an opportunity to attack while Canada is standing in the shadows training Afghans.


You are just looking for any reason to criticize the CPC so your biasness invalidates your opinion much as it does the usual anti-CPC suspects.


works both ways

R=UP


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
 Calgary Flames


GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 1651
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:02 pm
 


Derby Wrote: BTW, I am curious to hear your position concerning the break of security the CPC MP made by discussing Liberal plans to visit Afghanistan in advance, a serious break of security?

Even a Liberal supporter has to realize that if he did get killed, it would be the best thing to ever happen to that party because that frenchie has no chance of becoming PM. He just looks like a little weasel.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 20460
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:05 pm
 


mtbr mtbr:
DerbyX DerbyX:
BTW, I am curious to hear your position concerning the break of security the CPC MP made by discussing Liberal plans to visit Afghanistan in advance, a serious break of security?

.


Do you really think Dion was in danger of an attack from the Taliban. I'm sure the Taliban like Dions non-combat role, gives them an opportunity to attack while Canada is standing in the shadows training Afghans.


You are just looking for any reason to criticize the CPC so your biasness invalidates your opinion much as it does the usual anti-CPC suspects.


works both ways

R=UP


Wrong again chummer. You guys woudl have had a hairy fit had it been a Liberal email concerning a CPC visit and you know it.

In addition your assesment is dead wrong about the Taliban liking Canadas role as proposed by Dion. In fact they might actually hate it more. Instead of killing infidel non-believers, something that our allies aren't shedding any tears over they will be forced to kill even more ANA soldiers and thus the ANA might take a little more interest in controlling their own country.

My position is let them sort this mess out on their own and requires neither bias for or against the CPC.

In addition, I'm not making up a reason to attack the CPC like you guys are when attacking the Liberals nor am I taking words out of context. I am quite clearly applying the same standard to a security breach that you guys would absolutely have done had the situation been reversed.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 35280
PostPosted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:09 pm
 


stokes stokes:
Even a Liberal supporter has to realize that if he did get killed, it would be the best thing to ever happen to that party because that frenchie has no chance of becoming PM. He just looks like a little weasel.


Wow, advocating killing. Real classy. Remember Kim Campbells ad making fun of Jeans face and how well that went over? Yeah, that went well...


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 92 posts ]  1  2  3  4  5 ... 7  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.