I freggen hate this whole debate, and i freggen hate that this incident has brought it up...again.
I will start off by saying, no matter how you slice it, a tazer is better than a bullet, period.
one thing that noone has mentioned, why hasn't anyone blamed the mother?!? she is the one who left her immigrant son at the freggen airport...ever heard of a PA system lady? sure he can't speak english, but i'm sure he can recognize his name! that's why he was all distraught in the first fucking place, because his freggen mother left him at the airport and went home!!!
police work is a constant doubble edged sword, with the public expecting police officers to be supermen, and condemn them as evil, sadistic, corrupt, killers the second shit happens.
I remember back a few months ago, people were all pissy at hospital security for deploying a tazer on some dick head trying to steal a baby, pretty much same fucking argument, eventhough upon closer examination, the secuity officers did their job very well.
lets look at the situation, granted all information is from that 10 min video, which is of course bullshit in it's own right, everyone in the world making their opinions from that one video, like it tells the WHOLE story or something!
so, one guy, pissed, irrational, and with no way of communicating his frusturations to others, and has chosen to attempt to communicate this through violent actions. Three RCMP officers, into a situation with an irate individual with no way of communicating with him.
options:
OC - messy shit, risk of contaminating a large area of enclosed space of airport.
-risk of spraying fellow officers in struggle, danger to officers/public (anyone with a breathing problem would be effected)
-if suspect we already wound up, and got sprayed, may send him into a panic to where he may blindly strike at the officers and/or cause an underlying medical condition to surface and he died because his body was in such a state of shock. (he obviously had some sort of medical condition, because it is rare for a person to die from being tazed).
Old fashion police pile on - again risky due to close proximity of irate individual, what if the individual had some sort of weapon on him (remember ANYTHING can be a weapon) and decided to use in when he was in close with the officers?
- armchair judges may think use of force excessive 3 v 1, and again, police are the bad guys.
- underlying medical condition surfaces when suspect is in duress and struggling, and bam heart attack/stroke/shock...dead.
Firearm - i know i don't have to explain the implications of using a firearm on an unarmed irate individual, so it is safe to say this option wasn't close to being on the minds of the responding officers.
truly the tazer was a very viable, 'as much force as necissary to affect the arrest' option.
- no proximity to the individual = officer safety
- no use of chemicals = officer/civilian safety
- tazer is safe as it has been deployed hundreds of thousands of times with an extremely low fatality rate.
this is just a shitty example of when it's your time to die....you die.
no fault of the officers, nothing more they could do, and now they have to live with the knowledge that their actions taken to SAVE A LIFE, ended up costing one. Not to mention the horrible scruteny they are going to have to live through for the next few months/years as the investigation is held.
chalk this one up to a real bad day at the office, good luck Officers, this is one Canadian who is on your side!!
![Drink up [B-o]](./images/smilies/drinkup.gif)