[Newsbot]

Title: 285 Papers 70s Cooling 1
Category: Weather
Posted By: uwish
Date: 2019-12-03 09:55:07

[uwish]

"Not only did Connolley � a co-founder (along with Michael Mann and Gavin Schmidt) of the realclimate.com blog � successfully remove (or rewrite) the history of the 1970s global cooling scare from the Wikipedia record, he also erased (or rewrote) references to the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age so as to help create the impression that the paleoclimate is shaped like Mann�s hockey stick graph, with unprecedented and dangerous 20th/21st century warmth."

[BartSimpson]

uwish uwish:

"Not only did Connolley � a co-founder (along with Michael Mann and Gavin Schmidt) of the realclimate.com blog � successfully remove (or rewrite) the history of the 1970s global cooling scare from the Wikipedia record, he also erased (or rewrote) references to the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age so as to help create the impression that the paleoclimate is shaped like Mann�s hockey stick graph, with unprecedented and dangerous 20th/21st century warmth."

for calling out a fraud when you see it!!!

[Tricks]

Yawn.

https://skepticalscience.com/70s-coolin ... art-I.html
https://skepticalscience.com/70s-coolin ... rt-II.html

Dealt with before. Any other like 5 year old blog posts your going to dig up?

[N_Fiddledog]

Tricks Tricks:

Yawn.

https://skepticalscience.com/70s-coolin ... art-I.html
https://skepticalscience.com/70s-coolin ... rt-II.html

Dealt with before. Any other like 5 year old blog posts your going to dig up?

I'd agree with you if your point was just that this one doesn't belong in Current
Events but that's where your opinion stops mattering.

"Dealt with before?" I'm going to assume you believe you won something in some previous thread. I don't remember that. Show us.

"5 year old blog posts?" Your link to the critique of the post is just a year old and it is also from a blog - assuming we're going to concede your contention that blogs as sources matter. In fact Skeptical Science is the blog that pushed a phony "study" relying on its readers' input that imagined the bogus 97% consensus.

No Tricks proposal of Connelloy as an untrustworthy propagandist who at one time managed with confederates to take control of Wikipedia and rewrite articles for Climate alarmist propaganda purpose is true. In fact he was eventually banned from Wikipedia for it.

Tottering on your high horse yet?

How about this then, if you actually read SS's post they aren't so much saying No Trick's findings are false as they are saying they don't think his findings matter.

I would disagree. I would say this:

$1:

Of course, the global cooling scare during the 1970s was not narrowly or exclusively focused upon what the temperatures might look like in the future, or whether or not an ice age was “imminent”. It was primarily about the ongoing cooling that had been taking place for decades, the negative impacts this cooling had already exerted (on extreme weather patterns, on food production, etc.), and uncertainties associated with the causes of climatic changes.

does matter.

So you've got some known tricksters with a rebuttal that doesn't - as you would like to imply - actually debunk anything. Good for you. What else ya got?

[Martin15]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

uwish uwish:

"Not only did Connolley � a co-founder (along with Michael Mann and Gavin Schmidt) of the realclimate.com blog � successfully remove (or rewrite) the history of the 1970s global cooling scare from the Wikipedia record, he also erased (or rewrote) references to the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age so as to help create the impression that the paleoclimate is shaped like Mann�s hockey stick graph, with unprecedented and dangerous 20th/21st century warmth."

for calling out a fraud when you see it!!!

Spock agrees !!