Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy:
DrCaleb DrCaleb:
Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy:
I personally think that the deicision for abortion is between a woman and her conscience but with that being said. The Governor campaigned on this issue which means that there is likely a very large portion of Georgians who agreed with him or he wouldn't have gotten elected. So the signing of the bill shouldn't have come as this very large surprise like it's opponents are now claiming.
I think you missed the part of the election where if your name was misspelt on the voter list in comparison to your ID, you couldn't vote. This appeared to coincidentally affect people who were not going to vote for the incumbent.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... brian-kemphttps://www.theroot.com/congress-takes- ... 1832760149How can you can tell who people were going to vote for and how can you tell all the disqualified ones were all pro abortion?
You appear to have missed this part from one the Gaurdian article which you posted:
$1:
So-called "heartbeat bills" like Georgia's have become a popular tool among states looking to reduce abortion access. At least 15 states have introduced similar legislation this year and the governors of Kentucky, Mississippi and Ohio have signed theirs into law. None of those laws have been successfully enacted, according to the reproductive health research organization the Guttmacher Institute.
So, given your inuendo that the only reason the incumbent governor who supported this bill got elected was because of voter fraud allow me to ask. Were the other Governor races in the aforementioned 15 other states, 3 who have signed the "heartbeat" bill into law all due to voter tampering?
You seem to be misinterpreting my post.
I have no idea who was going to vote for or against an abortion bill. I'm just stating that you writing "a very large portion of voters who agreed with him or he wouldn't have gotten elected" isn't correct, when a portion of the voters disagreeing with him were prevented from voting.
You'll also notice the other article:
$1:
What they found was a stack of interwoven intentional efforts by Georgia’s former secretary of state (now governor) Brian Kemp to disenfranchise black voters.
Anti-abortion laws tend to disproportionately affect black voters.
https://www.vox.com/identities/2018/1/1 ... cal-racismPresumably, the disenfranchised voters would have been against any law regarding the limitations imposed on a right to choose.
That's my point here.