[Newsbot]

Title: Strengthen immigrant integration strategy or risk public backlash, experts warn
Category: Political
Posted By: N_Fiddledog
Date: 2017-10-29 09:41:14
Canadian

[N_Fiddledog]

From BCF:

"It's no wonder, that was the goal of mass immigration from Day 1. Population replacement is the end game and all our political parties are guilty.

Mass immigration is a Ponzi scheme that benefits big business and our vote whoring political class. Multiculturalism and diversity are used as bludgeons to keep citizens in line as all opposition is branded "racist" resulting in a compliant, divided and fearful populace.

Your country, your birthright has been stolen."

https://www.blazingcatfur.ca/2017/10/29 ... ys-expert/

[Vbeacher]

These pro-immigration people always make the right sorts of mouth noises. They say it's going to help our economy, and it's needed because of our low birth rate, but they never EVER provide actual evidence.

For example, has anyone ever seen any sort of government report which shows exactly what sort of economic benefit we might be getting? Or any report on how many immigrants are successful vs unsuccessful? or anything about the overall cost to all levels of government? Nope. They just repeat the same mantra over and over again like Goebbels, and by now most Canadians will just repeat it back to them as if it's real. But there's precious little, if any evidence to support it. The only actual detailed report I've seen came from the Fraser Institute, which said immigration is costing the three levels of government $30 billion per year.

[DrCaleb]

Vbeacher Vbeacher:

For example, has anyone ever seen any sort of government report which shows exactly what sort of economic benefit we might be getting? Or any report on how many immigrants are successful vs unsuccessful? or anything about the overall cost to all levels of government?

Yes. There was a great study recently how the Refugees from Vietnam not only contributed many times more into taxes than they were given in order to settle in Canada, but their children more often became highly skilled professionals than the rest of the population.

It, and other studies are summed up nicely here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_ ... _to_Canada

And other examples:

http://ccrweb.ca/en/refugees-contributions-canada

https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/news/n ... dmail.com&

[CharlesAnthony]

Canada is full.
Canadians do not need more immigrants. We have more than enough.

[DrCaleb]

[Vbeacher]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

Vbeacher Vbeacher:

For example, has anyone ever seen any sort of government report which shows exactly what sort of economic benefit we might be getting? Or any report on how many immigrants are successful vs unsuccessful? or anything about the overall cost to all levels of government?

Yes. There was a great study recently how the Refugees from Vietnam not only contributed many times more into taxes than they were given in order to settle in Canada, but their children more often became highly skilled professionals than the rest of the population.

It, and other studies are summed up nicely here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_ ... _to_Canada

You mean like this?
However, over the last 25 years the economic position of newcomers to Canada relative to the native population has steadily declined. A 2007 Statistics Canada study shows that the income profile of recent facsimile s deteriorated by a significant amount from 2000 to 2004.[1] Recent immigrants themselves are far more likely than native born Canadians to initially have low incomes, with income and employment rates increasing towards the national average with more time spent in Canada.

And this?

There is no agreed view on the net impact of immigration in current times.

$1:

And other examples:

Like most of your cites there are no actual dollar figures, no actual statistics to make comparisons, just pleasant examples of industrious refugees/immigrants. But the Globe story did point out:

In the late 1970s, immigrants earned about 85 to 90 per cent of what the Canadian-born earned. By 2006 that figure had fallen closer to 60 per cent, according to a recent study from the Institute for Research on Public Policy. Although employment rates tend to catch up within five to 10 years, it's taking longer and longer for wages to match.

[Vbeacher]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

[img]https://i.pinimg.com/736x/cb/9f/a2]

I'd like to see that. All the non-natives leave - and take everything with them that they built. That would leave the natives all alone in a vacant land with no power, no bridges, highways or roads, no cities or farms, and no welfare.

99% of them would be dead in a year.

[DrCaleb]

Vbeacher Vbeacher:

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

[img]https://i.pinimg.com/736x/cb/9f/a2]

I'd like to see that. All the non-natives leave - and take everything with them that they built. That would leave the natives all alone in a vacant land with no power, no bridges, highways or roads, no cities or farms, and no welfare.

99% of them would be dead in a year.

So you want to see all the natives dead? Pretty cold, man.