CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 2:10 am
 


Title: Ottawa clears up confusion over bank �bail-in�
Category: Business
Posted By: N_Fiddledog
Date: 2016-03-27 00:28:08
Canadian


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14747
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 2:10 am
 


April 02 2013?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33691
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 2:23 am
 


Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy:
April 02 2013?



The original rules were proposed by the last Con gov't.

Justine, using his impressive imagination to make things better,
has used the same shit word for word.

The fact that they now have to run around and 'explain' it,
should give everyone cause for worry.


Ah, ok now I understand the date issue.



Garth has a bit on it in his latest blog entry.

http://www.greaterfool.ca/2016/03/25/merchants-of-fear/


Just remember, CDIC only works as long as the gov't says it does.
Until it doesn't.

There is no real life fund to protect deposits.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15244
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 6:18 am
 


100% Not true. The CDIC does have a fund, funded by premiums paid by financial institutions, that currently has over $3billion in assets, which is triple the amount of insurable loses expected in a single year.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 10666
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 6:43 am
 


martin14 martin14:
Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy:
April 02 2013?



The original rules were proposed by the last Con gov't.

Justine, using his impressive imagination to make things better,
has used the same shit word for word.

The fact that they now have to run around and 'explain' it,
should give everyone cause for worry.


Ah, ok now I understand the date issue.



Garth has a bit on it in his latest blog entry.

http://www.greaterfool.ca/2016/03/25/merchants-of-fear/


Just remember, CDIC only works as long as the gov't says it does.
Until it doesn't.

There is no real life fund to protect deposits.


Garth Turner? [laughat]

URL is fitting.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33691
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 6:53 am
 


BeaverFever BeaverFever:
100% Not true. The CDIC does have a fund, funded by premiums paid by financial institutions, that currently has over $3billion in assets, which is triple the amount of insurable loses expected in a single year.


Sure.
Until there is a run on the banks.
You know, like Cyprus.
Then there is nothing.


Wiki
According to the CDIC's 2012 Annual Report, CDIC protects $622 billion CAD in total eligible deposits, and has $2.44 billion CAD in assets to meet insurance claims.[5] This amount represents 0.39% of total eligible deposits. The CDIC is also authorized to borrow up to $19 billion if necessary from the federal government or the financial markets, and may request further funds from Parliament.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 7:49 am
 


martin14 martin14:
Until there is a run on the banks.
You know, like Cyprus.
Then there is nothing.


Wiki
According to the CDIC's 2012 Annual Report, CDIC protects $622 billion CAD in total eligible deposits, and has $2.44 billion CAD in assets to meet insurance claims.[5] This amount represents 0.39% of total eligible deposits. The CDIC is also authorized to borrow up to $19 billion if necessary from the federal government or the financial markets, and may request further funds from Parliament.


You want them to set aside a $622 billion dollar fund? Talk about your massive deficit.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33691
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 8:02 am
 


andyt andyt:
martin14 martin14:
Until there is a run on the banks.
You know, like Cyprus.
Then there is nothing.


Wiki
According to the CDIC's 2012 Annual Report, CDIC protects $622 billion CAD in total eligible deposits, and has $2.44 billion CAD in assets to meet insurance claims.[5] This amount represents 0.39% of total eligible deposits. The CDIC is also authorized to borrow up to $19 billion if necessary from the federal government or the financial markets, and may request further funds from Parliament.


You want them to set aside a $622 billion dollar fund? Talk about your massive deficit.



I would prefer that people know the truth.

Everything is insured, until the government says it isn't.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 8:19 am
 


From your own link: Deposits would be excluded from the bail-in regime.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33691
PostPosted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 8:29 am
 


They said the same in Cyprus, until they didn't.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15244
PostPosted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 8:06 am
 


martin14 martin14:
BeaverFever BeaverFever:
100% Not true. The CDIC does have a fund, funded by premiums paid by financial institutions, that currently has over $3billion in assets, which is triple the amount of insurable loses expected in a single year.


Sure.
Until there is a run on the banks.
You know, like Cyprus.
Then there is nothing.


Wiki
According to the CDIC's 2012 Annual Report, CDIC protects $622 billion CAD in total eligible deposits, and has $2.44 billion CAD in assets to meet insurance claims.[5] This amount represents 0.39% of total eligible deposits. The CDIC is also authorized to borrow up to $19 billion if necessary from the federal government or the financial markets, and may request further funds from Parliament.


That's true of any kind of insurance anywhere, think of your car or house insurance for example. There is not enough money in the world to pay out every insured person if they all submitted insurance claims for their homes or cars at once. But of course that is statistically not likely to happen.

Insurance doesn't have to put one dollar aside for every dollar they insure that would be insane. They just have to have more money set aside than they are every likely going to need to have at once.

Now, Cyprus isn't Canada. Cyrpus is a small country with a modest economy and lax regulation. The Cyrpriot banks borrowed heavily and also invested heavily in risky foreign debts that defaulted, particularly in Greece.

In contast, in Canada, there is only so much risk that banks are allowed to take on -- thanks to regulations from that "big government" you righties hate so much. This is why Canada weathered the financial crisis with no melt-down of major banks.


Last edited by BeaverFever on Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 8:13 am
 


It would take one hell of a tax increase to amass a fund twice the sum of Canada's annual revenue. I'm sure there would be whining from Martine about Justine doing that. Can't win.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests



cron
 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.