CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 12:57 pm
 


Title: Anti-vaccination parents could be denied government benefits in Australia
Category: Health
Posted By: Regina
Date: 2015-04-13 07:02:19
Canadian


Offline
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
Profile
Posts: 841
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 12:57 pm
 


Good. These nut jobs are making decisions that now only screw their kids, but screw society in the process.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 1:52 pm
 


Prof_Chomsky Prof_Chomsky:
Good. These nut jobs are making decisions that now only screw their kids, but screw society in the process.


Not so fast. There are problems with some of the vaccines especially the MMR and Japan has now banned the combination vaccine in favor of separate immunizations for each disease.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... ccine.html

Myself, I object to mercury in my vaccines and I recently accepted a couple of mercury-free vaccines after my HMO notified me they were now available and that the HMO is going to cease using vaccines with mercury-based preservatives as of July 1 of this year.

Given the investment that this represents on their part I doubt they're doing it just because a scant minority objects to mercury. They're doing it to reduce liability in potential lawsuits.

Don't forget that more people contracted H1N1 via the vaccine than did any via person-to-person contact. :idea:

These vaccines are not instant miracles in a phial and that some people will choose to skip them needs to be a matter of personal liberty.

In the US we still have the irony that American kids are supposed to be vaccinated before they can attend public schools but illegal alien kids are not at all required to be vaccinated before they attend a public school.

If the vaccines are so bloody wonderful then why don't the illegals have to take them?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 21665
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 2:53 pm
 


Nanny state types. "You have an obligation to the state to stay healthy, therefore we will no longer allow you the freedom to make your own decisions."


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 35270
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 3:53 pm
 


But on the plus side, smokers will still be able to smoke, drinkers will still be able to drink, the obese will still be able to eat and those that practice dangerous sports or activities can carry on doing whatever it is they were doing. :D


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2015 4:04 pm
 


raydan raydan:
But on the plus side, smokers will still be able to smoke, drinkers will still be able to drink, the obese will still be able to eat and those that practice dangerous sports or activities can carry on doing whatever it is they were doing. :D


This is because smoking, drinking, and fast food are vital sources of tax revenue for the statists. :idea:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23084
PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2015 10:14 pm
 


Prof_Chomsky Prof_Chomsky:
Good. These nut jobs are making decisions that now only screw their kids, but screw society in the process.


R=UP


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2015 10:22 pm
 


Ridiculous - how does this affect parents who don't rely on government benefits? What should happen is that the kids are banned from public schools.


Offline
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
Profile
Posts: 841
PostPosted: Thu Sep 24, 2015 12:29 pm
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Prof_Chomsky Prof_Chomsky:
Good. These nut jobs are making decisions that now only screw their kids, but screw society in the process.


Not so fast. There are problems with some of the vaccines especially the MMR and Japan has now banned the combination vaccine in favor of separate immunizations for each disease.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... ccine.html

Myself, I object to mercury in my vaccines and I recently accepted a couple of mercury-free vaccines after my HMO notified me they were now available and that the HMO is going to cease using vaccines with mercury-based preservatives as of July 1 of this year.

Given the investment that this represents on their part I doubt they're doing it just because a scant minority objects to mercury. They're doing it to reduce liability in potential lawsuits.

Don't forget that more people contracted H1N1 via the vaccine than did any via person-to-person contact. :idea:

These vaccines are not instant miracles in a phial and that some people will choose to skip them needs to be a matter of personal liberty.

In the US we still have the irony that American kids are supposed to be vaccinated before they can attend public schools but illegal alien kids are not at all required to be vaccinated before they attend a public school.

If the vaccines are so bloody wonderful then why don't the illegals have to take them?



I knew you were a lot of things.. but an anti-vaccer never crossed my mind.
They literally ARE "instant miracles in a vial". Ask your grandparents how most people they knew died. They'll say, polio, various fevers, mumps, rubella... and war.
As for your mercury statement, it's insane. You get more mercury from eating a single serving of fish than from every vaccine you've ever had, ever. And unless we achieve herd immunity, they aren't 100% effective. They work on 70-90% of people. When you start deciding you don't need your shot we lose herd immunity, and then people who got the shot and it wasn't effective for die. Not to mention you're one selfish douchy SOB to basically leach off the good will of your fellow citizens who do get immunized. If everyone was an anti-vaccer 2 things would happen. First, people would start dying in masses. Second, everyone would remember why we need vaccines.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Thu Sep 24, 2015 1:49 pm
 


Prof_Chomsky Prof_Chomsky:
I knew you were a lot of things.. but an anti-vaccer never crossed my mind.


I'm not against vaccines in general but I'm also not instantly trusting of the same multinational and multibillion dollar pharmaceutical companies that you'll freely condemn if they make any money from a faulty medicine.

Also note that I oppose the MMR vaccine because it's been shown to be dangerous but that I have no objection to measles, mumps, and rubella being vaccinated separately and over time as that has been shown to be effective with far fewer deleterious side effects.

And while I object to mercury in my vaccines I don't object to vaccines that don't have mercury in them. The fact that big pharma is producing vaccines without mercury these days goes to the heart of the argument that the mercury was not needed to begin with.

(But you should keep using the mercury vaccines just to prove to me how much smarter you are than I am. :wink: )

That means I am not an 'anti-vaxxer'.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 3941
PostPosted: Thu Sep 24, 2015 7:01 pm
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
Prof_Chomsky Prof_Chomsky:
I knew you were a lot of things.. but an anti-vaccer never crossed my mind.


I'm not against vaccines in general but I'm also not instantly trusting of the same multinational and multibillion dollar pharmaceutical companies that you'll freely condemn if they make any money from a faulty medicine.

Also note that I oppose the MMR vaccine because it's been shown to be dangerous but that I have no objection to measles, mumps, and rubella being vaccinated separately and over time as that has been shown to be effective with far fewer deleterious side effects.



MMR has only been "shown to be dangerous" by a quack doctor who has been thoroughly discredited by his peers.

$1:
And while I object to mercury in my vaccines I don't object to vaccines that don't have mercury in them. The fact that big pharma is producing vaccines without mercury these days goes to the heart of the argument that the mercury was not needed to begin with.



the organic mercury compound was never harmful to begin with. this is unscientific bullshit that has been spread by people who have zero knowledge of chemistry and think they're an expert after spending a couple of hours on the internet.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 3941
PostPosted: Thu Sep 24, 2015 7:04 pm
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
If the vaccines are so bloody wonderful then why don't the illegals have to take them?


if you're not a statist, as you seem to claim, then why does the idea of "illegal" immigrants appeal to you? :idea:


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.