CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 4:34 pm
 


Title: Judge agrees Ottawa blogger was defamed, but it was 'fair comment'
Category: Law & Order
Posted By: N_Fiddledog
Date: 2015-03-06 12:16:21
Canadian


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 26145
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 4:34 pm
 


I didn't even know there was a Conservative message board in Canada.

So I tripped on over there to check it out, and Oh Oh...

They might might have beat Dr Dawg and his Prog Blog, but he wasn't the only problem.

We all know who Richard Warman is right? The guy who was responsible for almost all those human rights claims?

So I don't know, but it looks like they took away his section 13 toy, but now he's just suing, or something. I forget for what.

Anyway no more Free Dominion.

And "Rats", cause I'd just found it.

I think that's all correct anyway. I'm going by memory of what I read there last night. I just tried to check it out again, but the connection was dead. Wonder what was in there that was so horrible. There was just a notice explaining things last night, and few threads complaining about their windmill tilt for free speech in Canada.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 5:47 pm
 


$1:
In her ruling, Polowin found that John Baglow, an Ottawa blogger known as Dr. Dawg, had been defamed by an August 2010 chat room post that referred to him as “one of the Taliban’s more vocal supporters.”


Crap, I've said worse about people I like. Oversensitive much, Canada?


Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 57
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 5:53 pm
 


N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:
I didn't even know there was a Conservative message board in Canada.

So I tripped on over there to check it out, and Oh Oh...

They might might have beat Dr Dawg and his Prog Blog, but he wasn't the only problem.

We all know who Richard Warman is right? The guy who was responsible for almost all those human rights claims?

So I don't know, but it looks like they took away his section 13 toy, but now he's just suing, or something. I forget for what.


I think he has 3 different defamation suits and a copyright violation suit against Free Dominion.

$1:
Anyway no more Free Dominion.
. . .
I just tried to check it out again, but the connection was dead


Probably just a server problem - it sometimes happens to forums. :)
I believe that only regular members can get in to the actual forum - at least until (some of) the legal problems are settled.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 25516
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 5:55 pm
 


BartSimpson BartSimpson:
$1:
In her ruling, Polowin found that John Baglow, an Ottawa blogger known as Dr. Dawg, had been defamed by an August 2010 chat room post that referred to him as “one of the Taliban’s more vocal supporters.”


Crap, I've said worse about people I like. Oversensitive much, Canada?

Pretty sure I call a friend a terrorist at least once a day.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 42160
PostPosted: Fri Mar 06, 2015 8:18 pm
 


$1:
Today, Ontario Superior Court Justice Robert Smith issued an order in the Richard Warman vs Mark and Connie Fournier and John Does defamation case heard September, 2013. In addition to ordering that we must pay Warman $127,000, Justice Smith issued an injunction against us ordering we that never publish, or allow to be published, anything negative about Richard Warman. This means we are barred for life from ever operating a public forum or a blog (even about cookie recipes) where the public can comment. If we do so, any one of Warman’s handful of supporters could, and probably would, use a common proxy server to avoid being traced, plant a negative comment about Warman on our site, and we would both be charged with contempt of court. If that happened --unlike in the Ottawa courtroom where we were blocked at every turn from presenting a defense-- we actually would have no defense. We would both go to jail. This life sentence was imposed for our terrible crimes of voicing our honestly held beliefs and allowing others to do the same. Defamation law, in its current state, is entirely inadequate and counterproductive when applied to the internet. Now it is being used as a tool of censorship. Effectively!

We are assessing our options.

In faith,
Mark and Connie Fournier

"If it takes force to impose your ideas on your fellow man, there is something wrong with your ideas. If you are willing to use force to impose your ideas on your fellow man, there is something wrong with you." - Mark Fournier


This is what it says on the homepage. never really went there as I was labelled too ......left winged.....yeah, me 8O


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.