andyt andyt:
Since there's no mention of the death penalty, I assume it wasn't on the table in the first place. Otherwise there would have been a long tug of war around that. Didn't we insist that Ng guy who was a serial killer not be executed before we would send him back? He spent forever here, as I recall.
I'm totally against the death penalty, but have problem sending people to countries that have it, as long as a fair trial can be assured (We should be monitoring that). Their country, their laws. Don't do the crime there if you don't want to be executed.
Anyway, good - he'll be the US's to deal with now. Since he's not black and poor, he'll probably get a fair trial.
I stand corrected. We can and have sent people to countries with the death penalty knowing that's the conviction they face.
$1:
Ng fought a protracted legal battle against extradition to the United States, on the grounds that Canada—which has no death penalty—would be violating his human rights by permitting him to stand trial in California for capital murder. A habeas corpus request failed, as did an application to the Alberta Court of Appeal. In 1991, the Canadian Supreme Court ruled it was legal to extradite him even if he were to face the death penalty in Reference re Ng Extradition, and he was extradited that same year.
Charles Ng is one who is currently spending his time on death row awaiting his final fate. It might just be Canadian Citizens who are issued a get out of death row free card if extradited to countries with the Death Penalty but I'm not sure?
Anybody?