[Newsbot]

Title: 'Burger King raped my face', claims model on angry YouTube video
Category: Business
Posted By: N_Fiddledog
Date: 2014-08-07 14:31:42

[N_Fiddledog]

[raydan]

Can't be serious... no way!!!

$1:

She’s released a YouTube video, under the name RV Wonderspunk...

Wonder spunk!

[Delwin]

Ah the life of a model. I guess she'll think twice before signing a contract giving a company the right to do what they want with her image. If I owned a porn company, I would literally buy the rights to the image and actually show her what it means when you sign rights to your image away.
http://www.istockphoto.com/photo/woman-in-shock-7134570
http://www.istockphoto.com/help/licenses

She's just pissed that she whored her image away for nothing and a major company picked it up for $10 bucks and made millions off of it.

[Jabberwalker]

RV Wonderpuke ...

[sandorski]

Ugh. Ok, I can understand being upset because you didn't get a royalty(or whatever would apply)for being in such a campaign, but claiming "Face rape" and implying they are alluding to a BJ is fuckin ridiculous.

[Public_Domain]

[Delwin]

Spare me the feigned outrage. You are the degenerate for defending this money grubbing whore.

This bitch sold her images, signed off the rights, got paid, and is looking for a bigger cash-in.

For her to suggest that BK raped her face, is not only disingenuous, but is a slap in the face to rape victims everywhere. Have you been raped ? Do you know anyone who has ? You think this pathetic scum's "suffering" that according to her own account she didn't even know existed is comparable to a rape victim ?

Sickening.

[Delwin]

I guess she's glad they didn't use this photo, in a "suggestive" way.

[Public_Domain]

[Delwin]

Why not outright defend a rapist and let us really know how you feel about rape victims?

[Public_Domain]

[Delwin]

How do you defend the marginalizing of rape victims and try to take the moral high ground?

[Public_Domain]

[2Cdo]

Public_Domain Public_Domain:

They used her image without direct consent to make shitloads of money while sexualizing her and their product.

They didn't need her consent as she sold the rights to those pictures to a distributing party. I don't think she's a whore, bitch or anything else like that, and I also don't think Burger King did anything wrong, but she was stupid in surrendering her rights to those pictures.

Live and learn.