CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 10:39 pm
 


Title: Proposed ticketing scheme for minor offences could save police considerable cash
Category: Law & Order
Posted By: Strutz
Date: 2013-12-15 11:25:32
Canadian


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2372
PostPosted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 10:39 pm
 


I wonder how much it will save when you factor in the cost of extra manpower to process payments as well as people to track down and arrest(?) people who don't pay on time or submit it to a credit agency?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 10503
PostPosted: Sun Dec 15, 2013 11:10 pm
 


All I can think of is the Demolition Man...


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14747
PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 1:58 am
 


llama66 llama66:
All I can think of is the Demolition Man...


$1:
Simon Phoenix: Look I don't need a history lesson! C'mon, HAL, where are the god damn guns?

Moral Statute Machine: You are fined one credit for a violation of the Verbal Morality Statute.

Simon Phoenix: What? Fuck you!

Moral Statute Machine: Your repeated violation of the Verbal Morality Statute has caused me to notify the San Angeles Police Department. Please remain where you are for your reprimand.

Simon Phoenix: Yeah, right.

[police sirens approach]

Simon Phoenix: Fuckers are fast too.

Moral Statute Machine: You are fined one credit for a violation of the Verbal Morality Statute.



ROTFL


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 21611
PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 3:18 am
 


:|


Last edited by Public_Domain on Sun Feb 23, 2025 7:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 6642
PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 9:17 am
 


Public_Domain Public_Domain:
Cool, I'll be watching Demolition Man later.


This


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7835
PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:17 am
 


The best scene involves Stallone's acquisition of toilet paper. :lol:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 13404
PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:27 am
 


It's the instantaneous presumption of guilt when you get a ticket (and you have to pay it within a tight time frame) that disturbs me. So much for the Anglo Saxon legal traditions.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:27 am
 


Haven't read the article, but you can dispute tickets, so I don't see the diff.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 13404
PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:34 am
 


andyt andyt:
Haven't read the article, but you can dispute tickets, so I don't see the diff.



The diff is that most people won't be bothered to do so. They will just pay up, particularly when they are threatened with dire consequences if the payment isn't made within a short period of time. If you're not sure how the courts are going to evaluate your arguments, you will likely opt for a simpler "guilty" and pay a lesser fine rather than risk something like garnish of your wages.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:39 am
 


That's on you then. You face the same hazard if you go to court under the current system


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 13404
PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:41 am
 


The difference between bait and sushi is all in the presentation.

If you receive a ticket with a DEMAND of payment within 7 days OR ELSE ... most people will be intimidated into folding.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:46 am
 


It's no different than a traffic ticket or what have you. It says clearly on the ticket you can dispute. My guess is that if you're not guilty you'll dispute. Now, I've been not guilty of speeding (knew exactly where the radar trap was) but the cop nabbed me anyway, and the judge believed him, not me. Guess people with minor offenses face the same hazard.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.