Freakinoldguy Freakinoldguy:
The oil's gonna move whether we like it or not and it'll go by rail if they can't get it out by pipeline. I'd personally rather see it going through a new pipeline than an outdated and rickety railroad that hasn't been properly maintained since Mackenzie King was Prime Minister. But hey that's just me.
The only real issue I have is where it's shipped from on the coast. I'd rather they found a better place to ship from than one that requires, tugs, pilots, blind pilotage abilities and is enshrouded with shitty weather for a good part of the year, not to mention which is also 90 Km from open water.
So, hopefully some common sense will prevail but then again we're talking about politicians here so that's doubtful. Besides BC should be getting guarantees from the Federal and Alberta Gov't that they'll pay for any and all spills rather than allowing a company with Enbridge's record to "promise" they'll pay for any cleanup.
The only ones who should be guaranteeing it are Enbridge and its customers. Alberta shouldn't be liable for the pipeline or the shipping anymore than BC should be liable for eastbound freight trains or anything else shipped from Vancouver across the country.
Otherwise, I largely agree. FTR, I think Prince Rupert would have a better choice for the terminal, but what do I know?
The smart move would be a new (strengthened older) law in BC allowing them to fine Enbridge a couple billion dollars if a tanker sinks in the Douglas Channel.