$1:
Objectively speaking, having actually been there more times than I'd like to remember, Neil's right
He's right about the area being a moonnscape. Large open pit mines aren't pretty. He's wrong about the impacts. There's not a lot of evidence to support that people are dying due to the oil sands operations. The problem with bringing the First Nations into it is that due to astronomical levels of smoking (compared to the general population) not to mention rampant alcohol and substance abuse issues, it's impossible to tease out any potential minor effect that may be related to oil sands.
Lemmy Lemmy:
He may be right, but I'd rather hear it from someone with actual knowledge about the issue than a figure head for the latest cause-celeb. And Neil a lefty? Dunno about that. He's pretty much an anarchist; seems more of an extreme righty than an extreme lefty.
Latest cause? I don't think so. He wrote a song called "After the Gold Rush" in 1970:
Look at Mother Nature on the run
In the 1970sThe thing is that there is a groundswell of movement that is against the pipelines and against the oil sands, but a lot of it is due to the fact that they are worried about oil dependency and global warming and the complete failure of the political and corporate structure to deal with it. That's why these people rail against pipelines and the oil sands, but can rarely articulate what their specific issues are (in the same way the Tea Party crowd railed against Obamacare, but apart from a couple of talking points, couldn't articulate what they didn't like about it).