BartSimpson BartSimpson:
DrCaleb DrCaleb:
I don't mean to support the things Morsi supporters or Morsi detractors do; but sending in snipers to put bullets in the heads of people who won't leave the camps isn't the answer either. The military has shown they will not allow Egypt to become an islamist state (that Syria is in danger of becoming).
And given the examples that have been set in Libya and Syria the military is responding in the correct manner against an adversary that has amply demonstrated their inclinations to wage war.
I guess I'm just naïve in thinking that the job of a military is to defend a country, and the job of Police is to defend the rule of law. As such; tear gas, riot police, flashbangs, firehoses, shotguns with beanbags and even claymore style deployed tasers are what you use against civillian crowds. Snipers, not so much.
I recall phycological studies I read; that because Militaries are trained to fight outside enemies, if they are deployed against civillians as law keepers, over time they tend to see the civilians they are charged to protect as 'the enemy' and nothing good comes of it.
I dunno, I'm just a computer geek.
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
DrCaleb DrCaleb:
I just think there was a better way to disperse the crowds other than with gunshots.
I disagree. Gunshots are
damned effective at clearing crowds!

Yea, but going all G-20 on them also is effective, without all the adverse international attention.
