Lemmy Lemmy:
No one's saying he deserved what he got. What they're saying is that he started the altercation and deserved some measure of retribution for snowing the goalie. There are certain things that players do that are provocation. They're done with the intention of stirring up shit, and snowing the goalie is one of those. It's like standing at home plate and admiring a homerun. You're asking for a fastball in the back next time up.
Yes, the Woodstock player deserved a push, a light cross check, a hook or a tripping. Beating him into the ground is not the sort of thing he "deserved". I understand the reluctance to swear charges against the Brantford player, but the beating he threw down certainly exceeds the sort of rough altercations one normally consents to when playing hockey.
You can consent to throw fists, you can't consent to having a fang knocked out or a concussion suffered.