CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Sun May 05, 2013 6:52 am
 


Title: MacKay: New search planes eventually, but process 'challenging'
Category: Misc CDN
Posted By: Hyack
Date: 2013-05-04 11:36:01
Canadian


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 6642
PostPosted: Sun May 05, 2013 6:52 am
 


I'm quickly growing tired of the "we would but it's too hard" line. If they finally got around to realising the procurement system is a convoluted mess, why don't they change it?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23565
PostPosted: Sun May 05, 2013 6:58 am
 


Perplexing don't even cover it. Viking out here would bend over backwards to build fixed wing Twin Otters in a heartbeat.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 42160
PostPosted: Sun May 05, 2013 7:25 am
 


I'm reminded of the Asterix and Obelix cartoon where they have to complete a task in 'the place that sends you mad' Government bureaucracy and inefficiency.....they uddy up the waters in what should be a very simple process.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2103
PostPosted: Sun May 05, 2013 9:59 am
 


Gunnair Gunnair:
Perplexing don't even cover it. Viking out here would bend over backwards to build fixed wing Twin Otters in a heartbeat.


No that would be too simple. 8O

They have to gum up the works with a search for a plane that can do everything.

Damn right build turbo Twin Otters. There are some proven designs that it's simply not possible to better by any significant degree. The Twin Otter is one of those; that's why there are still so many of them flying all over the world, in all kinds of conditions.

Try landing some big, fancy "state of the art" plane on a frozen lake, or putting it on floats.

The other design they should consider, if they want something a little larger, is this one:

0:
caribou.JPG
caribou.JPG [ 133.79 KiB | Viewed 59 times ]


Again a proven design, STOL-capable, good payload. Not a damn thing wrong with it.

But no, they have to muck about, waste time and spend 20x what it should cost.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 6642
PostPosted: Sun May 05, 2013 12:54 pm
 


Thought Viking was able to build those too, with updated engines, that could fly faster, higher, and farther.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Calgary Flames
Profile
Posts: 33561
PostPosted: Sun May 05, 2013 12:56 pm
 


Not that it'll ever happen but a Royal Commission that examined and uncovered exactly what the hell has gone wrong at DOD procurement would probably get the support of all Canadians, no matter where we are on the political spectrum. These guys are making the bureaucracy at the United Nations look efficient and honest in comparison.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15244
PostPosted: Sun May 05, 2013 6:56 pm
 


Yeah, Viking said they could produce a new Buffalo fleet (which would be better than
'Twotters') but they were rebuffed by DND, who they claimed is married to the C27 Spartan.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2103
PostPosted: Sun May 05, 2013 8:36 pm
 


I don't think we need Spartans. They're getting on toward the size of a Hercules, and why do we need such a large plane for SAR. I'll bet you could build 3 or 4 Buffalos for the price of one Spartan, and you'd have a proven Canadian-designed and -built aircraft.

The newest and shiniest toy isn't necessarily the best one.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 21665
PostPosted: Mon May 06, 2013 9:08 am
 


ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:
I'm reminded of the Asterix and Obelix cartoon where they have to complete a task in 'the place that sends you mad' Government bureaucracy and inefficiency.....they uddy up the waters in what should be a very simple process.


Yeah, that's what McKay would have you believe. Government ineptitude--indeed governmetn malevolence--is such a touchstone to the modern conservatvie that the very ideathat perhaps--just perhaps--the system isn't good is completely alien to them.

McKay and all teh conservatives have masteretd this. There's no more scandals anymore; just a contemptuous finger at the Bureaucracy, and they dog pile on the civil servants who, of course, can't say anything different without losing their jobs.

Real leaders know that the buck stops at the top. Real leaders take accountability when their teams don't perform. Even Rona Ambrose is losing patience with McKay's incompetence.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 70 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.