[mtbr]

DerbyX DerbyX:

Include the prior 10 then.

It still shows a declining curve under the Liberals and an increasing curve under Harper.

of course it's increasing it just finally arrived back to the point of the Liberals.

than post the whole graph

[DerbyX]

mtbr mtbr:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Yep. Notice how mtbr cherry picks his own graph. He can't see that from a high of 11% to a low of 6.5% under the Libs is extremely good and yet he claims no blame for Harper when his numbers reach the sky.

cherry picks

you mean the one from stats can? the unreliable source

Suuuure. Statscan, the actual source for the data is wrong but some con blog site called indexmundi is what you consider a reputable source.

Notice how you don't include the decline in unemployment from 11% to 6.5% from 93 to 2000.

Notice how you omit the data showing a massive increase in unemployment under Harper.

Unlucky.

[DerbyX]

mtbr mtbr:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Include the prior 10 then.

It still shows a declining curve under the Liberals and an increasing curve under Harper.

of course it's increasing it just finally arrived back to the point of the Liberals.

than post the whole graph

Still far under the rate when they first took over meaning a great achievment.

[mtbr]

DerbyX DerbyX:

mtbr mtbr:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Yep. Notice how mtbr cherry picks his own graph. He can't see that from a high of 11% to a low of 6.5% under the Libs is extremely good and yet he claims no blame for Harper when his numbers reach the sky.

cherry picks

you mean the one from stats can? the unreliable source

Suuuure. Statscan, the actual source for the data is wrong but some con blog site called indexmundi is what you consider a reputable source.

Notice how you don't include the decline in unemployment from 11% to 6.5% from 93 to 2000.

Notice how you omit the data showing a massive increase in unemployment under Harper.

Unlucky.

statscan... do you think they are lying about the source why don't you post some stats to prove it incorrect?

you still haven't explained the high unemployment in the early part of the decade..you know after the liberals had been in charge for so long
read the chart it's up to date where did I omit any stats?

[DerbyX]

In other words when you look at unemployment from 70 to present you get the whole picture rather then a con hack crying about trying to blame unemployment on the Libs.

Sorry for your luck!

[mtbr]

DerbyX DerbyX:

In other words when you look at unemployment from 70 to present you get the whole picture rather then a con hack crying about trying to blame unemployment on the Libs.

Sorry for your luck!

why do you ask a question and than dodge the answer

Pathetic.

[DerbyX]

mtbr mtbr:

you still haven't explained the high unemployment in the early part of the decade..you know after the liberals had been in charge for so long
read the chart it's up to date where did I omit any stats?

Jan 1999 was 6.8. Liberal.

Jan 2009 was 7.8. CPC

Explain that.

[mtbr]

DerbyX DerbyX:

mtbr mtbr:

you still haven't explained the high unemployment in the early part of the decade..you know after the liberals had been in charge for so long
read the chart it's up to date where did I omit any stats?

Jan 1999 was 6.8. Liberal.

Jan 2009 was 7.8. CPC

Explain that.

Jan 1999 was 7.9.

why do you refuse to read the chart

[DerbyX]

mtbr mtbr:

DerbyX DerbyX:

In other words when you look at unemployment from 70 to present you get the whole picture rather then a con hack crying about trying to blame unemployment on the Libs.

Sorry for your luck!

why do you ask a question and than dodge the answer

Pathetic.

I keep answering. Unemployment was better under the Liberals then it was under the PCs and better then the CPC.

Spin that.

[mtbr]

DerbyX DerbyX:

mtbr mtbr:

DerbyX DerbyX:

In other words when you look at unemployment from 70 to present you get the whole picture rather then a con hack crying about trying to blame unemployment on the Libs.

Sorry for your luck!

why do you ask a question and than dodge the answer

Pathetic.

I keep answering. Unemployment was better under the Liberals then it was under the PCs and better then the CPC.

Spin that.

you can't even acknowledge that the stats I posted from Statscan are correct why should I expect you to answer any questions

[Axeman]

Both sides are still arguing when I've alreay told you you're both wrong. One side says "The Earth is the centre of the universe", the other side says "No, the sun is the centre of the universe." You can argue back and forth all day long...you're BOTH STILL WRONG!

[DerbyX]

mtbr mtbr:

DerbyX DerbyX:

mtbr mtbr:

you still haven't explained the high unemployment in the early part of the decade..you know after the liberals had been in charge for so long
read the chart it's up to date where did I omit any stats?

Jan 1999 was 6.8. Liberal.

Jan 2009 was 7.8. CPC

Explain that.

Jan 1999 was 7.9.

why do you refuse to read the chart

Take a good look. Unemployment is rising under Harper.

Why do you refuse to take into account the decline from 93 to 2000?

Oh, thats right. You only want to look at it if it serves your point.

Unemployment under Mulroney in 93: ~11%.

unemployment under the Liberals in 2006 ~6.5%

Current unemployment under Harper in 2009 ~7.8%

Nuff said!

[DerbyX]

mtbr mtbr:

you can't even acknowledge that the stats I posted from Statscan are correct why should I expect you to answer any questions

The stats from statscan show a great decrease under the Liberals and a large increase under Harper which you will not account for.

[mtbr]

Axeman Axeman:

Both sides are still arguing when I've alreay told you you're both wrong. One side says "The Earth is the centre of the universe", the other side says "No, the sun is the centre of the universe." You can argue back and forth all day long...you're BOTH STILL WRONG!

the only reason why I'm still posting is Derby is in denial about the unemployment stats I posted, but he can't post any other ones to prove them wrong.

[mtbr]

DerbyX DerbyX:

mtbr mtbr:

you can't even acknowledge that the stats I posted from Statscan are correct why should I expect you to answer any questions

The stats from statscan show a great decrease under the Liberals and a large increase under Harper which you will not account for.

the stats from statscan show that only now the unemployment rate is equal to what it was in the early part of the decade...as I posted 3 pages back.

where is that not accounted for?