| |
| Author |
Topic Options
|
Posts: 7710
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:00 am
Gunnair Gunnair: Nice meltdown.  You're such a stupid little nobody. Get a life stalker.
|
Posts: 23565
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:15 am
tritium tritium: Gunnair Gunnair: Nice meltdown.  You're such a stupid little nobody. Get a life stalker. It continues... 
|
Posts: 7710
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:26 am
Gunnair Gunnair: It continues... 
|
Posts: 23565
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:52 am
tritium tritium: Gunnair Gunnair: It continues...  You know, if you didn't wander through the forum bitching endlessly about how Canada sucks or parts of BC suck while touching yourself as you talk about your time in Texas, you might not get called on it. 
|
Posts: 7710
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:10 am
Gunnair Gunnair: tritium tritium: Gunnair Gunnair: It continues...  You know, if you didn't wander through the forum bitching endlessly about how Canada sucks or parts of BC suck while touching yourself as you talk about your time in Texas, you might not get called on it.  First off troll, I said Vancouver Sucks. Never have I started a thread stating Canada sucks, and your endless "stalking" on the issue is absolutely tiresome. Yeah, I lived 14 years in Texas and 2 years in Los Angeles, but I now live in Canada and plan on staying. If I disliked Canada, I would not stay. Sure when I first returned I bitched a little about changes that had taken effect since I left Canada 16 years earlier. I find a country that was once rated the #1 country in the world by the United Nations as fallen so far. I want Canada to regain that #1 position!! I was shocked about prices (homes, rent, fuel) and homeless on the streets which I never saw in Canada before. (people sleeping in doorways of shops, hurts my heart to see this in Canada) It was culture shock returning to my own country at the time and took some getting use to. I was born in Canada, and I AM CANADIAN!! 1ST. ........................................................ OH YEAH!! Also, my roommate posted under my account for a spell. I noticed this and told Treavor. I changed my password, this was a few months ago.
|
Posts: 23565
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:31 am
"tritium" - Gunnair Gunnair: You know, if you didn't wander through the forum bitching endlessly about how Canada sucks or parts of BC suck while touching yourself as you talk about your time in Texas, you might not get called on it.  $1: First off troll, I said Vancouver Sucks. That would be a part of BC, but you knew that of course when you wrote that. $1: Never have I started a thread stating Canada sucks, and your endless "stalking" on the issue is absolutely tiresome. Never said you did, but you also knew that when you wrote your reply as well. What you do often is whine about how Canada sucks when it does something you disagree with: kinda like a six year old when he doesn't get a chocolate bar at the grocery store. $1: Yeah, I lived 14 years in Texas and 2 years in Los Angeles, but I now live in Canada and plan on staying.
If I disliked Canada, I would not stay. Sure when I first returned I bitched a little about changes that had taken effect since I left Canada 16 years earlier. Actually, you continue to bitch and you judge the entire country for it. Canada sucks, you said not long ago. $1: I was born in Canada, and I AM CANADIAN!! 1ST. You sure don't sound like it at times. ........................................................ $1: OH YEAH!! Also, my roommate posted under my account for a spell. I noticed this and told Treavor. I changed my password, this was a few months ago. Right... 
|
Demian_164
Active Member
Posts: 272
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:41 am
way to ruin the thread babies
|
Posts: 7710
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:49 am
wow, point by point. Honestly I wouldn't waste my time with point by point (little gayish), but I see you did. swell. You bitch just as much Gunnair, you have lots of posts that bitch about issues. That is what a forum is all about opinions. But as I stated before, you're a stalker harping on a Canada Sucks issue, that does not exist. Seems the minute I post something here you run to that thread and fondle yourself at the thought. I am glad you find bravery behind the anonymity of the Internet. 
|
ASLplease
CKA Elite
Posts: 4183
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:08 am
those prices arent bad, it used to cost 3/4 billion for a F35, that is the reason why we hung onto the CF18 program for so long. but now the CF18 program is getting old, very old. we need a replacement, F35 are not expensive, they are actually quite cost effective. Bruce_the_vii Bruce_the_vii: The F35 is not popular and enormously expensive. It will never be used. The rest of the military will need equipment as well.
I talked to people and they thought 40 planes or so would do and that Canada should re-equip for our traditional role as peace keeper. That would be transport ships and helicopters and that, which will also be hugely expensive.
The 65 fighters will cost $9 billion and another $7 billion to maintain. That is $246 million for each one. That is too expensive.
The polls are telling the Liberals the plane in un-understandable and unpopular and Ignatieff is going with it. So good.
|
Posts: 23565
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:56 am
tritium tritium: wow, point by point. Honestly I wouldn't waste my time with point by point (little gayish), but I see you did. swell. You bitch just as much Gunnair, you have lots of posts that bitch about issues. That is what a forum is all about opinions. But as I stated before, you're a stalker harping on a Canada Sucks issue, that does not exist. Seems the minute I post something here you run to that thread and fondle yourself at the thought. I am glad you find bravery behind the anonymity of the Internet.  Yeah, you're an internet hero. As far as your Canada sucks bitchfest, it's in the forums and the nerve has obviously been struck. $1: Well after today's vote.. it's no longer Canada Kicks Ass... more on the lines Canada Sucks Ass Next time, instead of whining about how the country all of a sudden sucks, maybe you could show a shred of political maturity and say the decision sucks, our the outcome of the vote sucks. Next time, don't be a whining unpatriototic sh*thead and you won't get called on it. 
Last edited by Gunnair on Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Posts: 23565
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:57 am
Demian_164 Demian_164: way to ruin the thread babies Hope the irony of your flaming people for flaming isn't lost on you. 
|
Posts: 7710
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:15 pm
Gunnair Gunnair: Next time, don't be a whining unpatriotic shithead and you won't get called on it.  ...again as posted above, proof is in the podding. tritium tritium: Seems the minute I post something here you run to that thread and fondle yourself at the thought. I am glad you find bravery behind the anonymity of the Internet. 
|
Posts: 23565
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:19 pm
tritium tritium: Gunnair Gunnair: Next time, don't be a whining unpatriotic shithead and you won't get called on it.  ...again as posted above, proof is in the podding. tritium tritium: Seems the minute I post something here you run to that thread and fondle yourself at the thought. I am glad you find bravery behind the anonymity of the Internet.   Wow...... your tantrum is almost Biblical. Anonymity? Really? You're tossing about insinuations while under your username? really? ![laughing at [laughat]](./images/smilies/smilie_auslachen.gif)
|
Posts: 23565
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:30 pm
Bruce_the_vii Bruce_the_vii: As far as I can make out the submarines were for training NATO. The Americans don't even have conventional subs so they needed them in inventory for NATO. The media reported that the subs that Canada bought from Britain could be used for "fisheries partol". Fuck. Well, the subs were for domestic ops with international ops capabilities. The fact that they are conventional and the US prefers training with deisels is secondary. Fisheries patrols, well, maybe, but they've shown some use for anti-drug patrols. thing is, they can get some great evidence gathering and no one knows any better.
|
Posts: 23565
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:33 pm
ASLplease ASLplease: those prices arent bad, it used to cost 3/4 billion for a F35, that is the reason why we hung onto the CF18 program for so long. but now the CF18 program is getting old, very old. we need a replacement, F35 are not expensive, they are actually quite cost effective. Well, the C130 is an old design, but we just bought a new generation of them with the C130J. I think it's a good argument that buying a new generation F 18E is not necessarily a bad business decision and take some of the money saved to invest in ground support Apaches.
|
|
Page 6 of 7
|
[ 102 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests |
|
|