Mr_Canada Mr_Canada:
The Hammer and Sickle is a symbol used worldwide by many groups. It's a symbol initially designed to show solidarity between Workers and Farmers.
And the swastika was a symbol of Buddhist faith. And then the Nazis used it. Sure, the swastika is still the same symbol for the Buddhists, but they certainly aren't going to parade it around like that might have before the 20th century.
$1:
The idea that the symbol should be repressed is nothing more then an attempt to shut out the Communist voice in the modern world, which is obnoxious.
The Hammer and Sickle is a symbol for not just a political system, but a social system. It expands far farther then the former USSR and is used by almost all Communist factions equally.
Yeah, those other Communist factions aren't exactly beacons of greatness either. But you're right, the symbol shouldn't be repressed. No symbol should be repressed. If somebody wants to wear a swastika, let them. If somebody wants to wear a Hammer and Sickle, let them too. Sadly, the Hammer and Sickle aren't faced with the same stigma as the Swastika when they both represent the oppression and murder of millions.
$1:
If you're going to attack the politics, understand I'm not of the politics you accuse me of. If you're only going to attack the symbol, then it's not a fair
nor appropriate argument against the politics.
So if I attack the politics and the social system of Communism, you're not of that, but if I attack the symbol, it's an unfair attack on the politics? The symbol represents the politics, much like the Bald Eagle and the American flag represents the United States. Or how the dollar sign has grown to represent capitalism and the United States.