[mtbr]

DerbyX DerbyX:

mtbr mtbr:

DerbyX DerbyX:

You cannot blame the Liberals for unemployment without blaming harper for the skyrocketing unemployment.

.

BS it never went down every year....why was unemployment so high in the Liberal years especially before 2001? we know why it's high now

It was near 11% when they took over. It went down steadily.

Explain Harpers massive unemployment increase in the same context as blaming the Liberals then.

it went up in their last 4 years...

Global Recession...whats the Liberal excuse?

[DerbyX]

mtbr mtbr:

it went up in their last 4 years...

Global Recession...whats the Liberal excuse?

No, it didn't. It went down from 03 to 07.

[mtbr]

DerbyX DerbyX:

mtbr mtbr:

it went up in their last 4 years...

Global Recession...whats the Liberal excuse?

No, it didn't. It went down from 03 to 07.

0:

rates.png [ 3.27 KiB | Viewed 192 times ]

really
why are you in denial


yeah and the Libs were in charge for 06 and 07

[Axeman]

mtbr mtbr:

it went up in their last 4 years...

Global Recession...whats the Liberal excuse?

Come on! You know their response. It's that any economic problems are to be blamed on the risidual effects of Mulroney's government. Which, Conservatives say are to be blamed on the residual effects of Trudeau's government. It's the same bullshit arguement on both sides. The economy IS CYCLICAL and the Business Cycle doesn't pay attention to election returns.

[DerbyX]

You keep posting data that is disputed by reputable sources.

You are the equivalent of lynne foster posting surftofind data.

[mtbr]

Axeman Axeman:

mtbr mtbr:

it went up in their last 4 years...

Global Recession...whats the Liberal excuse?

Come on! You know their response. It's that any economic problems are to be blamed on the risidual effects of Mulroney's government. Which, Conservatives say are to be blamed on the residual effects of Trudeau's government. It's the same bullshit arguement on both sides. The economy IS CYCLICAL and the Business Cycle doesn't pay attention to election returns.

shhhhhh !

[RUEZ]

Axeman Axeman:

The economy IS CYCLICAL and the Business Cycle doesn't pay attention to election returns.

You appear to be correct.
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/71-222-x/2008001/c-g/desc/desc-a2-eng.htm

[DerbyX]

Look at that. It went down until harper took over in early 2006 then went up.

Then it went up a whole lot under Harper.

[DerbyX]

RUEZ RUEZ:

Axeman Axeman:

The economy IS CYCLICAL and the Business Cycle doesn't pay attention to election returns.

You appear to be correct.
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/71-222-x/2008001/c-g/desc/desc-a2-eng.htm

Just like here

They even discuss reasons.

mtbr just wants to blame the Liberals.

[mtbr]

DerbyX DerbyX:

You keep posting data that is disputed by reputable sources.

You are the equivalent of lynne foster posting surftofind data.

0:

stats can.png [ 19.64 KiB | Viewed 155 times ]

[RUEZ]

DerbyX DerbyX:

Look at that. It went down until harper took over in early 2006 then went up.

Then it went up a whole lot under Harper.

Are we looking at the same graph?

[mtbr]

RUEZ RUEZ:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Look at that. It went down until harper took over in early 2006 then went up.

Then it went up a whole lot under Harper.

Are we looking at the same graph?

of course not I keep asking him about the 3 prior years .

[DerbyX]

RUEZ RUEZ:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Look at that. It went down until harper took over in early 2006 then went up.

Then it went up a whole lot under Harper.

Are we looking at the same graph?

Yep. Notice how mtbr cherry picks his own graph. He can't see that from a high of 11% to a low of 6.5% under the Libs is extremely good and yet he claims no blame for Harper when his numbers reach the sky.

[DerbyX]

mtbr mtbr:

RUEZ RUEZ:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Look at that. It went down until harper took over in early 2006 then went up.

Then it went up a whole lot under Harper.

Are we looking at the same graph?

of course not I keep asking him about the 3 prior years .

Include the prior 10 then.

It still shows a declining curve under the Liberals and an increasing curve under Harper.

[mtbr]

DerbyX DerbyX:

RUEZ RUEZ:

DerbyX DerbyX:

Look at that. It went down until harper took over in early 2006 then went up.

Then it went up a whole lot under Harper.

Are we looking at the same graph?

Yep. Notice how mtbr cherry picks his own graph. He can't see that from a high of 11% to a low of 6.5% under the Libs is extremely good and yet he claims no blame for Harper when his numbers reach the sky.

cherry picks

you mean the one from stats can? the unreliable source