Zipperfish Zipperfish:
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
Riiiiiight. It has absolutely nothing to do with the Black Bloc being a bunch of fucktards that turn peaceful protests and demonstrations into an excuse to burn, loot and smash public and private property, while bleeding heart shit-pumps excuse their actions saying they have the right to protest.
What the police need is to be allowed to crack right down on ANYONE covering their face at a protest/demonstration. If that means smacking their little pin-head skulls in to remove them, oh well.
So you are saying then people shouldn't have the right to protest?
Are you suggesting the Black bloc are legitimate protestors? Cuz I thought the right was to
peaceful demonstration/protest. Last time I checked, that right didn't include damaging/destroying public and private property.
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
Any other important parts of the Constitution you want to do away with?
To which important part are you referring, the part that says you have the right to cover your face in public? Or the part that says you have the right to damage/destroy other people's stuff cuz yer pissed off at the world?
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
Geez, one little protest and you're just ready to pack up all your freedoms and hand them over to the police.
Really? You consider the G20, the Occupy movement, the London student strike and the current nonsense in Montreal to be "one little protest"? Take a wild guess what all those protests had in common. Then, take a wild guess who was causing the bulk of the problems?
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
It must suck to be that frightened.
Not nearly as much as having to resort to strawmen.
Although I would imagine it would suck for those people that have had their property damaged or destroyed while people like you excuse the behaviour of those that cause the damage by waffling on about rights. All while you manage to argue that anyone that wants to try and prevent that from happening must obviously hate freedom.
