Brenda Brenda:
Pseudonym Pseudonym:
Yes, but the analogy seems to lie in that if the woman is the only deciding factor in the abortion's occurence, why should the man be obligated to take part in the result?
What about the pro-life crowd? Then the man has to pay? Even if HE doesn't want it?

The pro-life crowd could consistently state that it is both parents' responsibility for the child they have made so both should support it. The analogy just seems to indicate that there is an inconsistency between making a women the sole decision-maker and then requiring the man to pay for the result. I wouldn't seriously consider doing such an act myself, but it is an interesting thought.
EDIT: And yes, I would make the man pay for it. Men seem to get away with too much nowadays. Delinquency of this sort should be criminalized.