CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15681
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:37 pm
 


So a grow op is 500 plants in every room? Where did you get that definition from?

5 plants is more than enough for personal consumption.

A harvest every 60-90 days will produce about $1000 of good weed per plant.
5 plants could produce $30,000 of weed in a year. How much can one person smoke?

Your druggy past doesn't seem to be able to deal with the facts.


Last edited by EyeBrock on Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 22594
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:40 pm
 


Curtman Curtman:
ridenrain ridenrain:
Curtman is an admitted criminal and has no credability on law & order topics.


There you go,

"DON'T LISTEN TO HIS WORDS!!!!! THE SKY IS STILL FALLING!!!"


I hate to break it to you but your not some persecuted, brilliant visionary here. Your just another entitled loudmouth that thinks the rules don't apply to them. I guess that's a pre-requisite for being a Liberal though.





PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:46 pm
 


EyeBrock EyeBrock:
So a grow op is 500 plants in every room? Where did you get that definition from?

5 plants is more than enough for personal consumption.

A harvest every 60-90 days will produce about $1000 of good weed per plant.
5 plants could produce $30,000 of weed in a year. How much can one person smoke?

Your druggy past doesn't seem to be able to deal with the facts.


Hold on now.. You were talking about the dangers grow ops pose to a neighborhood.

Do you really believe 5 plants is a danger?





PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:49 pm
 


ridenrain ridenrain:
I hate to break it to you but your not some persecuted, brilliant visionary here. Your just another entitled loudmouth that thinks the rules don't apply to them. I guess that's a pre-requisite for being a Liberal though.


Oh really.. You think a 16 year old kid who makes a bad decision should be blacklisted from society. For driving some pot around.

This is reefer madness all over again.


Last edited by Curtman on Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
Profile
Posts: 4183
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:49 pm
 


Curtman Curtman:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
So a grow op is 500 plants in every room? Where did you get that definition from?

5 plants is more than enough for personal consumption.

A harvest every 60-90 days will produce about $1000 of good weed per plant.
5 plants could produce $30,000 of weed in a year. How much can one person smoke?

Your druggy past doesn't seem to be able to deal with the facts.


Hold on now.. You were talking about the dangers grow ops pose to a neighborhood.

Do you really believe 5 plants is a danger?


Not if you are dissolving it into gycerin and shoving it up your ass, but smoking it is a different story.





PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:51 pm
 


ASLplease ASLplease:
Not if you are dissolving it into gycerin and shoving it up your ass, but smoking it is a different story.


We're talking about fires buddy.. Whatever you shove up your ass is your own thing.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
Profile
Posts: 4183
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:57 pm
 


well if you are talking fires, its not the number of plants that determine the risk, its the quality of the grow lamp instalation. so what was you point?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 22594
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:58 pm
 


Curtman Curtman:
ridenrain ridenrain:
I hate to break it to you but your not some persecuted, brilliant visionary here. Your just another entitled loudmouth that thinks the rules don't apply to them. I guess that's a pre-requisite for being a Liberal though.


Oh really.. You think a 16 year old kid you makes a bad decision should be blacklisted from society. For driving some pot around.

This is reefer madness all over again.



It's simply not happening. People are not going to jail for having a couple plants. Folks growing their own pot are not going to jail but you need that straw man to support your BS support of these unrepresentative senators.

The last decade of government stacked the judiciary with folks who are soft on drug crimes and, with the approval of the voters of Canada, this government is trying to reverse that. Setting manditories is the only effective way that the government can influence these unrepresentative judges.

Put your drug policy on your party platform. Stop trying to sneak it through by using appointed judges and senators.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15681
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:59 pm
 


Curtman Curtman:
EyeBrock EyeBrock:
So a grow op is 500 plants in every room? Where did you get that definition from?

5 plants is more than enough for personal consumption.

A harvest every 60-90 days will produce about $1000 of good weed per plant.
5 plants could produce $30,000 of weed in a year. How much can one person smoke?

Your druggy past doesn't seem to be able to deal with the facts.


Hold on now.. You were talking about the dangers grow ops pose to a neighborhood.

Do you really believe 5 plants is a danger?


No I don't. But if somebody was trying to hide excessive hydro use because they had more plants, public safety could be impacted.

People know that they will get treated very lightly by both police and the courts for five plants.
Ten plants? You are trafficking and you will try and hide your illegal activity.

There will be lights, pumps etc in a confined space without any regulations even being considered.

It's all about the profit. So what if your townhouse goes up in flames?

You are very typical of the average grow-op dude who cares little about his fellow man. He will grow his weed despite any risks to his neighbours that his illegal activity could bring.

It's because of people like you that people like me have a job.
We are there trying to protect the innocents from selfish lawbreakers who put personal profit before public safety.

And the Liberal senators just sided with people like you. Nice.





PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:03 pm
 


ASLplease ASLplease:
well if you are talking fires, its not the number of plants that determine the risk, its the quality of the grow lamp instalation. so what was you point?


My point is that a couple of lights don't use enough current to pose a danger. Less than what my microwave oven and coffee maker would.

50 lights do.

The gangsters are the ones with the grow-ops. Locking up growers supports the gangsters.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
Profile
Posts: 4183
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:05 pm
 


one poorly place lamp in an enclosed space can be a hazard





PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:05 pm
 


EyeBrock EyeBrock:
No I don't. But if somebody was trying to hide excessive hydro use because they had more plants, public safety could be impacted.

People know that they will get treated very lightly by both police and the courts for five plants.
Ten plants? You are trafficking and you will try and hide your illegal activity.

There will be lights, pumps etc in a confined space without any regulations even being considered.

It's all about the profit. So what if your townhouse goes up in flames?

You are very typical of the average grow-op dude who cares little about his fellow man. He will grow his weed despite any risks to his neighbours that his illegal activity could bring.

It's because of people like you that people like me have a job.
We are there trying to protect the innocents from selfish lawbreakers who put personal profit before public safety.

And the Liberal senators just sided with people like you. Nice.



You go right back to bypassing hydro again. If you felt strongly about this you wouldn't want to see large scale operations in your neighbourhood which bypass hydro.

You would want to see either:

A) Large scale operations moved to commercial locations
B) People growing small scale operations

You support neither of these. You support more of the same.





PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:07 pm
 


ASLplease ASLplease:
one poorly place lamp in an enclosed space can be a hazard


Thanks for that.. We don't lock people up for having lamps.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
Profile
Posts: 4183
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:08 pm
 


thats true. You are a good dancer.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15681
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:18 pm
 


Again you miss the point curtman.

If weed was legal I'd be all for commercial ops.
But it isn't and it's unlikely to be legalised soon.

The pressing problem is illegal grow-ops in residential areas.

That's what we need to concentrate on. You and your chums growing weed across the road or next-door to Granny Atkins.

You are the hazard. You and your ilk put others at risk but you spout off pretending to be some kind of libertarian.

You are just a hazard to society, but the really sad thing is that you don’t even know it.

See how many people are supporting your stance? It should tell you that your clueless attitude doesn’t resonate outside your baseball hat wearing chums.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 134 posts ]  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.