[Tricks]

Are we just going to parrot this website from now on? Is that where we are? Just wondering.

[uwish]

well doc likes 'data' or he claims to..so I am quoting them and listing them for reference.

Do you actually have anything constructive to ad?

[Tricks]

uwish uwish:

well doc likes 'data' or he claims to..so I am quoting them and listing them for reference.

Do you actually have anything constructive to ad?

I will when you do bud.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/notrickszone/

"Quackery"

[DrCaleb]

uwish uwish:

well doc likes 'data' or he claims to..so I am quoting them and listing them for reference.

And yet there are no studies, no measurements, and no raw data. Only opinion. And obvious lies, like Hansen did not have a hand in many things that were listed.

Which is why I ignore you and your 'sources'.

[BartSimpson]

Doc, did you go to the Arctic Riviera for your winter vacation yet?

[uwish]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

uwish uwish:

well doc likes 'data' or he claims to..so I am quoting them and listing them for reference.

And yet there are no studies, no measurements, and no raw data. Only opinion. And obvious lies, like Hansen did not have a hand in many things that were listed.

Which is why I ignore you and your 'sources'.

I always post the data another dodge from doc

[DrCaleb]

As Tricks showed, no, you don't. You parrot other peoples bad and misleading blogs.

[raydan]

Here's the rating on uwish's blog "data"...

[DrCaleb]

[uwish]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

As Tricks showed, no, you don't. You parrot other peoples bad and misleading blogs.

the quotes are from the peer reviewed papers listed on the site, I am not interested in the blogger only the list of available papers...

good try tho another dodge.

[herbie]

Auditor general's report finds Ontario not using 'sound evidence' in climate change plan

[N_Fiddledog]

Tricks Tricks:

uwish uwish:

well doc likes 'data' or he claims to..so I am quoting them and listing them for reference.

Do you actually have anything constructive to ad?

I will when you do bud.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/notrickszone/

"Quackery"

I think it's time to cut the crap about left wing "fact checking" sites like Snopes or MediaBiasFactCheck.

Currently at MBFC the front page is covered with happy news that the Democrat witnesses at their conspiracy clown show of an impeachment inquiry plan to say nasty things about the President. They sound pleased.

In the climate debate the two largest blogs on either side are the one Tricks likes called Skeptical Science and one I like called Watt Up With That. I read them both. It's no secret I think SS sucks and WUWT rocks but I read them both. WUWT wins awards for best Science Blog. Skeptical Science is favored by the cabals calling themselves "the consensus." Both blogs have been known for a peer reviewed study each. (Personally I think the one from SS is ridiculous.) Both at least attempt to support posts with what they call data.

So I looked them both up on MediaBiasFactCheck. The contrast in opinion is laughable. Nothing in either opinion is factual. They're both total opinion based bias. Look them up. See if I'm not correct.

MediaBiasFactCheck is a left wing, biased, opinion site. If you think you've proved anything by posting their opinion on the bias of some other site you're only fooling yourself.

[N_Fiddledog]

herbie herbie:

Auditor general's report finds Ontario not using 'sound evidence' in climate change plan

From the article:

$1:

"Our office's analysis found that the emissions reductions in the plan are not yet supported by sound evidence," Lysysk writes in the report, which includes recommendations to help Ontario achieve reduction targets outlined in the Paris agreement.

So what else is new? What government provincial, municipal, state or federal does have a an emissions reductions plan supported by sound evidence?

Show us the benchmark for who's saving the world this week if you want to select somebody for judgement as a bad actor in comparison. I know Ontario's last government thought they were the world savers. How'd they do? Were their emissions reduction plans supported by sound evidence. What about Trudeau and Butts. Will the "sound evidence" of their emissions reduction plan save the world? If you say yes a lot of people disagree with you.

[CharlesAnthony]

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

So what else is new? What government provincial, municipal, state or federal does have a an emissions reductions plan supported by sound evidence?

No problem!

Just pour more money into the --- ahem, research and give more welfare to otherwise unemployable lab-coat nerds!

[N_Fiddledog]