[N_Fiddledog]

Thanos Thanos:

You mean "even though you produced someone from the "pro life" side who confirmed exactly what you said when I dared you to show such evidence I refuse to accept that it's real". Sure thing, Barney. 2+2=5! 2+2=5! 2+2=5!

Huh?

I don't know what you're talking about. Does that make 2 of us or are you going to show me?

Speaking of math though, you seem to have fallen back on what I call "Prog Math" which goes like this.



You say "Most at the March for life would oppose any form of birth control."

"2 = a number".

Then you say "here's a person who opposes any form of birth control."

"1 = a number."

Therefore 2 = 1.

Hang on...

I think I get it.

Were you saying that because I used myself as an example to make sure I understood your argument, as in "Question: would your argument apply to me?", then that is the same thing?

It's not. Surely you're not going to make me explain why it's not the same thing, are you?

[Thanos]

Hold on. I need a minute to figure out why you think the word "progress", used to define the growth that lifted humanity out of the muck of religious superstition, is some kind of an insult.

[N_Fiddledog]

Ah, and just by luck I happen to have seen a video this morning that explains that very thing, and seeing as I know how much you enjoy these, I'll share. No need to thank me.



So basically the portion of the left that likes to label itself "Progressive" has become "Regressive," and it's not just me who's noticed.

[Thanos]

I suppose I should count myself lucky that you just didn't happen to be watching another gem by Kirk Cameron, Ken Ham, or some other expert.

[BeaverFever]

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

Ah, and just by luck I happen to have seen a video this morning that explains that very thing, and seeing as I know how much you enjoy these, I'll share. No need to thank me.



So basically the portion of the left that likes to label itself "Progressive" has become "Regressive," and it's not just me who's noticed.

What difference is it to you? Do you wish the left would be more progressive? Do you consider yourself and conservatives to be progressive? What's your definition of progressive anyway?

[herbie]

Give him awhile until he scrapes a youtube from under the bottom of the Internet to explain it.

[Thanos]

Women's bodies got a way of shuttin' this shit down, gnomesayin'? All they gotta do when they feel the urge is to clamp an aspirin between their knees for a few hours until it goes away.

[N_Fiddledog]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

Ah, and just by luck I happen to have seen a video this morning that explains that very thing, and seeing as I know how much you enjoy these, I'll share. No need to thank me.



So basically the portion of the left that likes to label itself "Progressive" has become "Regressive," and it's not just me who's noticed.

What difference is it to you? Do you wish the left would be more progressive? Do you consider yourself and conservatives to be progressive? What's your definition of progressive anyway?

And...of course the expert on the video didn't watch it.

Would you like to know how I know you didn't watch it? He explains what you're asking about.

You see Dave Rubin considers himself a "classic liberal". He explains why and what he believes a classic liberal such as himself is. He also describes the thing currently calling itself "Progressive."

He complains that by "regressing" the left, the ideology calling itself "Progressive" has forced Liberals like himself into a position whereby in order to truly progress now they find themselves sharing common ground with Conservatives.

[BeaverFever]

I didn't ask you to parrot someone else's thoughts.

Answer the questions directly and in your own words.

[N_Fiddledog]

It's a common thought in my circle and has been for some time. Actually these liberals who are now discovering Progressives are Regressives are just learning what many Conservatives have known for some time.

In fact if you want to go weeding through my old posts (and you should, you might learn something) you'll discover I was distinguishing between Liberals (who really were liberal) and "Progressives" like yourself who are actually regressive for years. Before Rubin even had a YouTube channel, in fact.

I kind of like actual Liberals to tell you the truth.

But I present Rubin's explanation, because it's more idiot-friendly and if you were ever brave enough to click it you might learn something.

[Public_Domain]

[Public_Domain]

[raydan]

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

It's a common thought in my circle...

You have a circle!!!

[N_Fiddledog]

raydan raydan:

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

It's a common thought in my circle...

You have a circle!!!

Yeah, so do you. I know you like to try to sell yourself as Switzerland, but let's be honest. You're North Korea.

[N_Fiddledog]

Public_Domain Public_Domain:

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

Ah, and just by luck I happen to have seen a video this morning that explains that very thing, and seeing as I know how much you enjoy these, I'll share. No need to thank me.



So basically the portion of the left that likes to label itself "Progressive" has become "Regressive," and it's not just me who's noticed.

Ah yes, that "leftist" who's guests mostly seem to be only alt-right and ancap reactionary blowhards. Yet another gaslighter.

And translated out of Prog-comm where an exception will automatically prove a rule when convenient what that actually means is he'll talk to all ends of the spectrum.

But yeah, the "leftist" who began his career online as one of the Young Turks.