[BRAH]

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

[2Cdo]

andyt andyt:

2Cdo 2Cdo:

andyt andyt:

I'm twin Beaver? What does that mean?

Oooh, a spelling mistake.

you seem to make that "mistake" often. And obviously haven't clued in to your first "spelling mistake." Since they both involve being able to distinguish between contractions and possessives, I think you probably just don't know any better. Maybe Beaver has a point.

Wow. You must be an English major who's never made a spelling or grammer mistake ever!

[raydan]

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Wow. You must be an English major who's never made a spelling or grammer mistake ever!

English is my second language and I never make that mistake.

[N_Fiddledog]

BRAH BRAH:

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

I don't get it.

There's a point buried in there somewhere though, I'll bet, so I'm going to try to guess.

Are those guys in the berets the bunch that who used to patrol subways and such in urban areas? It's on the tip of my tongue, but I forget their names - something, something "Angels"...I think.

Some sort of citizen patrols...borderline vigilantes. Is that them or something like them?

If it is, then yeah, I get it.

[BRAH]

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

BRAH BRAH:

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

I don't get it.

There's a point buried in there somewhere though, I'll bet, so I'm going to try to guess.

Are those guys in the berets the bunch that who used to patrol subways and such in urban areas? It's on the tip of my tongue, but I forget their names - something, something "Angels"...I think.

Some sort of citizen patrols...borderline vigilantes. Is that them or something like them?

If it is, then yeah, I get it.

The guys in the berets are with the Guardian Angels who supported Bernhard Goetz after he shot black thugs because he felt they were a threat to his safety (If I recall). After watching your video there's going to be another Bernhard Goetz and when that happens the aftermath is going to be a shit show.

[BeaverFever]

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Let the backpedalling begin.

Your little pals back pedaling?[/quote]

Hey dropout dumbfuck: how many times do I have to say it? I BLAME HIM. Not MORE than criminals but he still bears responsibility. Can your dumbass brain be made to understandi any kind of nuance?

[2Cdo]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

Hey dropout dumbfuck: how many times do I have to say it? I BLAME HIM. Not MORE than criminals but he still bears responsibility. Can your dumbass brain be made to understandi any kind of nuance?

Do you blame car owners when they get their cars stolen liar?

[N_Fiddledog]

Did anybody see this one, last night?

Charlotte demonstrators break curfew to demand release of video of fatal shooting of Keith Scott

Well...careful what you wish for ladies.

Charlotte to release body and dash camera video of shooting

$1:

Asked whether he expected the footage to quiet protesters, Putney responded: "The footage itself will not create in anyone's mind as to what this case represents... the footage only supports the other information" such as forensic evidence and witness statements.

He also said that his officers didn't break the law but noted that the State Bureau of Investigation is continuing its investigation.
"Officers are absolutely not being charged by me, but again, there's another investigation ongoing," he said.

Putney said that Scott was "absolutely in possession of a handgun," and that officers also saw marijuana in his car -- prompting officers to act.

I'm looking for it now. Anybody know where it is?

[Freakinoldguy]

Yup, 9mm book who would have thought. I guess the police planted the gun and marijuana on him while he was still in the vehicle and then waited till he got out so they could shoot him.

Given the idiocy I'm honestly starting to think that some of these cases are suicide by police rather than anything to do with criminal intent by the morons who decide to climb out of a vehicle while holding a gun.

[Delwin]

Video available here:

http://www.wccbcharlotte.com/2016/09/24 ... tt/#slide1

[Delwin]

I just screencapped this.I am beginning to believe the wife on this one. I know it's grainy but that looks like a book. He might have been rolling a joint on it.

[Delwin]

Everything is inconclusive, of course, and its not my aim to fuel conspiracy theories but why are these guys wearing 1/2 megapixel cameras? The ankle holster also seems to appear out of no where in slow motion. Just saying. I'm going put together a slow motion gif.

[N_Fiddledog]

I don't see what you're claiming, but that image is clearer in the actual video.

:17



The ankle holster can also be viewed from :23 to :26.

Here's the complete dashcam vid:

Is that something in his left (not right) hand at :47-48?

[N_Fiddledog]

Check out this supposed "eye-witness" from yesterday.

1:54



Is that what you see in the dashcam vid? "Hands up. Don't shoot."

This one from yesterday is fun too. It's self-explanatory.

[Delwin]

Yeah, too grainy to say conclusively.The ankle holder thing you are right about. I think the gun would be in his right hand since right leg ankle holster.

Anyway, if it is a case of TBI like the wife said, the guy just could've been spaced out and not thinking after the joint he smoked.

It in no way to me looks like he was out to kill cops. If he was, he wouldve stayed in the vehicle and opened fire. He was backing up and could've put himself in a much better position defensively using the car door. It's a tough one.

But the gun was in my mind not planted. If he was wearing an ankle holster, he had owned the gun. The question is whether he had it in is hand or in the vehicle.

If this was a plant job, the most likely scenario would be they took it from the chair in the car were he might have left it and dropped it outside of the vehicle.

Either way, zero percent chance a cop gets convicted based on these videos alone.