[BartSimpson]

California will do the same. If you give a car to someone for cheap they tax you on the retail value.

[Canadian_Mind]

I'm gonna +1 the crowd that thinks the judge is an idiot.

[hurley_108]

Here's the judgement: http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/SC/ ... SC1678.htm

Read into it what you will but there is one undeniable fact: this is not precedent setting - it is precedent based. This judgement relied upon several established precedents going right up to the Supreme Court of Canada.

And those precedents lay out that you DO NOT have the unbreachable right to be a complete asshat to your kids after you die. If you have an estate, you have to give each child fair consideration. This miserable fuck didn't, and that's why his will was overturned.

[Brenda]

hurley_108 hurley_108:

Here's the judgement: http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/SC/ ... SC1678.htm

Read into it what you will but there is one undeniable fact: this is not precedent setting - it is precedent based. This judgement relied upon several established precedents going right up to the Supreme Court of Canada.

And those precedents lay out that you DO NOT have the unbreachable right to be a complete asshat to your kids after you die. If you have an estate, you have to give each child fair consideration. This miserable fuck didn't, and that's why his will was overturned.

Awesome. Thanks for the link

[KorbenDeck]

Are you fucken kidding me, a judge has the balls to decide what "moral obligations" the parent has to his adult children? Once you turn 18 your parents have NO obligations to you.

[Brenda]

KorbenDeck KorbenDeck:

Are you fucken kidding me, a judge has the balls to decide what "moral obligations" the parent has to his adult children? Once you turn 18 your parents have NO obligations to you.

Nor do you to your parents, right?

[KorbenDeck]

Brenda Brenda:

KorbenDeck KorbenDeck:

Are you fucken kidding me, a judge has the balls to decide what "moral obligations" the parent has to his adult children? Once you turn 18 your parents have NO obligations to you.

Nor do you to your parents, right?

Pretty much, its like that mom who abandoned her kids and is now sueing them for $800 each a month in support. I personally plan on supporting my parents when they need to but thats my choice the court should not be able to order me to by saying i have a "moral obligation" since the legal system is filled with the lest moral people in our society.