[Dayseed]

Pseudonym Pseudonym:

She commented on Bill Maher's Politically Incorrect in 1999 that she had dabbled in witchcraft when she was younger as part of her explanation for why she rejected it. She also mentioned that she had had a date with some witch on top of a Satanic altar, although she hadn't known those facts at the time. It really seems like her accusers are jumping on the weakest possible angle of attack against her character. It boggles my mind.

I agree. Her complete disavowal of evolution is a far bigger indictment of her intellectual capacity.

Delaware: Maligning Science Since One Of Our Senators Got Tricked Into Giving A Handy J On A Pretend Altar To Make-Believe.

I don't think that will fit on the licence plate.

[Mustang1]

Dayseed Dayseed:

Pseudonym Pseudonym:

She commented on Bill Maher's Politically Incorrect in 1999 that she had dabbled in witchcraft when she was younger as part of her explanation for why she rejected it. She also mentioned that she had had a date with some witch on top of a Satanic altar, although she hadn't known those facts at the time. It really seems like her accusers are jumping on the weakest possible angle of attack against her character. It boggles my mind.

I agree. Her complete disavowal of evolution is a far bigger indictment of her intellectual capacity.

Delaware: Maligning Science Since One Of Our Senators Got Tricked Into Giving A Handy J On A Pretend Altar To Make-Believe.

I don't think that will fit on the licence plate.

Nah...i say it's all fair game! She's blaming her stupidity on youth? Good one. She's a flake and she's consistently pushed anti-intellectual junk like anti-evolution and that homosexuality is a identify disorder based on nurture/social pressures/factors. I'd say this a pattern not an aberration.

Only her unabashed partisan apologists would defend this as immaterial.

[ShepherdsDog]

$1:

To the best of my knowledge ther is no Islamic Outfit

What about the his and hers cashmere martyr bomb vest? I hear it's made out of the wool of 72 virgin goats(No MacDonalds were obviously used in this process, hence the virgin wool).

[Gunnair]

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

The witch thing is overblown. I mean, I don't how many times I dropped a bucket-load of acid and dug up corpses to have sex with when I was a teenager. But do I do it now? Not nearly as often.

Shep said the same thing about goat blowing, but he didn't grow out of it...

Oh, that's because he's a Campbell....

[Gunnair]

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2010/09/21/christine-odonnell-needs-a-witches-spell-to-save-herself/

Ahhh... the Post.

[angler57]

If the folks in Washington D.C. knew the meaning of the words below and ever bother to read the U.S. Constitution and followed both, there would be no Tea Party.
Our people in D.C. created it. And,they refuse to understand that fact. To change course is beyond them. Their behavior just fans the flame of discontent.
If they understood the words, Of the people. By the people. And, for the people
the Tea Party would cease to exist.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPbIls0iOnI

[Gunnair]

[Pseudonym]

fifeboy fifeboy:

Pseudonym Pseudonym:

I feel fairly confident she would vote more in line with my personal views than her opponent, but some of these financial and character questions would need to be resolved before I would feel comfortable in supporting her for Senate. To be clear, I do support her now, I just am not as happy as I am with say, Joe Miller of Alaska or Jim DeMint of SC.

No hair on your palms eh!

Yup, first thing she's gonna do when she gets in office is submit a bill to ban masturbation and burn witches and save America for all us God-fearin' folks.

If it wasn't already clear, I was indicating that her votes on economic policy (no bailouts, repeal Obamacare, etc.) would be more in line with my views than Coons' (ban deepwater drilling, cap and trade, higher taxes). I think many of her supporters are displeased with these character questions, but side with her on policy rather than personal grounds.

[ShepherdsDog]

$1:

If it wasn't already clear, I was indicating that her votes on economic policy (no bailouts, repeal Obamacare, etc.) would be more in line with my views than Coons' (ban deepwater drilling, cap and trade, higher taxes).

[Pseudonym]

Chris Coons is her opponent in the general election.

[ShepherdsDog]

Sorry, I've read some posts in other forums where coons was used in a different context when discussing Obama. There really is a lot of hate out there and it isn't too far beneath the surface.

[BartSimpson]

angler57 angler57:

If the folks in Washington D.C. knew the meaning of the words below and ever bother to read the U.S. Constitution and followed both, there would be no Tea Party.

1. Thanks for writing a coherent sentence.

2. I agree with you. If the people in WDC would bother to read the Constitution and stay within its limits there'd be no reason for something like the Tea Party to exist.

The Tea Party are reactionaries. Without something to react to they'be absent a cause.

[fifeboy]

Pseudonym Pseudonym:

Yup, first thing she's gonna do when she gets in office is submit a bill to ban masturbation and burn witches and save America for all us God-fearin' folks.

If it wasn't already clear, I was indicating that her votes on economic policy (no bailouts, repeal Obamacare, etc.) would be more in line with my views than Coons' (ban deepwater drilling, cap and trade, higher taxes). I think many of her supporters are displeased with these character questions, but side with her on policy rather than personal grounds.

It is always so much fun to talk to you.

[fifeboy]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

angler57 angler57:

If the folks in Washington D.C. knew the meaning of the words below and ever bother to read the U.S. Constitution and followed both, there would be no Tea Party.

1. Thanks for writing a coherent sentence.

2. I agree with you. If the people in WDC would bother to read the Constitution and stay within its limits there'd be no reason for something like the Tea Party to exist.

The Tea Party are reactionaries. Without something to react to they'be absent a cause.

Actually, angler57 is well capable of writing coherent sentences. I have seen him on other forums and he don't talk hillbilly there. Why here?

[angler57]

Fifeboy says
Actually, angler57 is well capable of writing coherent sentences. I have seen him on other forums and he don't talk hillbilly there. Why here?

Thanks; We do get around the boards. Fear answering your question sorry.
Drop me a pm or E-Mail and will answer, why here.