CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 21665
PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 1:39 pm
 


N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:
Zipperfish Zipperfish:
I look forward to your lame-ass angry response so I can bat that one out of the park as well. :lol:


Seriously? You want to try to defend Al Gore? Batter up.

He wasn't able to get all Al gore's errors in an Inconvenient truth on 1 video. You can link to Part 2 at Youtube. I can give you more fraud, hypocrisy, and errors than that if you like.


Seriously--I'm pointing out that 2CDO's statement regarding what was "proven" was not in accordance with the ruling made by the judge.

That being that the judge agreed that the basics of AGW "are supported by a vast quantity of research published in peer-reviewed journals worldwide and by the great majority of the world's climate scientists."


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Boston Bruins


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11907
PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 2:04 pm
 


Zipperfish Zipperfish:
2Cdo 2Cdo:
An Academy award as a documentary, which has been proven to be nothing short of fantasy. As far as the Nobel prize goes, they gave Obama one for what they HOPE he does, certainly not for what he did in his first ten days of office. The Nobel Prize for Peace is a joke. :roll:


The only thing "proven" is your amazing lack of knowledge of the issue. Let's quote from the judgment that I'm sure you're referring to--not that you'd have bothered to actually back up any of your drivel with actual evidence. That would be clearly beyond you. But fear not, fortunately I actually have two braion cells to rub together so I'll do it for you:


Wow, insults immediately because I didn't fall swooning for Gore's fantasy flick.

$1:
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2007/2288.html

$1:
[Thew film] is substantially founded upon scientific research and fact, albeit that the science is used, in the hands of a talented politician and communicator, to make a political statement and to support a political programme...

These propositions [AGW], Mr Chamberlain submits (and I accept), are supported by a vast quantity of research published in peer-reviewed journals worldwide and by the great majority of the world's climate scientists.

I have no doubt that Dr Stott, the Defendant's expert, is right when he says that:

"Al Gore's presentation of the causes and likely effects of climate change in the film was broadly accurate."


Al's proposed numbers in the film, depicting rising ocean levels exceeded the UN's worse case scenario by tenfold. But I guess you missed that little fact.


$1:
I know this is diofficult for uber-conservatvies like you. Unfortuantely you're in such a constant state of mouth-foaming range that you've long ago lost your capacity for rational thought


I'd say the only one showing any mouth-foaming rage is yourself.


$1:
yes 2CDO, I'm sure your contributions to humankind that consist of--what?--wearing your pantsline around your nipples and complaining about the government full time rate so much higher than Mr. Gore's. Since you think peace is a joke and understand the world basically on par with the outlook ofa 8 year old schoolground bully, I imagine that the Nobel Peace prize would be completely beyond your dim comprehension--and therefore a joke to you. :lol:

I look forward to your lame-ass angry response so I can bat that one out of the park as well. :lol:


I don't recall saying peace is a joke, maybe you can highlight where I said it. I'm glad you got all of that from a statement that dared to counter your preconcieved notions of Saint Gore and Obama. Again, the only one showing any anger on this thread is yourself. Get over yourself, you're not as smart as you think you are.

Have a nice day. I look forward to your "mouth-foaming rage" retort. PDT_Armataz_01_14


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 26145
PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:07 pm
 


Zipperfish Zipperfish:
Seriously--I'm pointing out that 2CDO's statement regarding what was "proven" was not in accordance with the ruling made by the judge.

That being that the judge agreed that the basics of AGW "are supported by a vast quantity of research published in peer-reviewed journals worldwide and by the great majority of the world's climate scientists."


Semantics. 2cdo didn't even specifically mention the 9 scientific errors (there's lots more than those one's mentioned in the court case) the judge admitted to in court. I know you'd like to distract to that particular case, because you can point to this line, and I can't point to that one; in the end it's just a long distracting argument from the central fact. The central fact being...

Gore's full of crap. You know it. I know it.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 21665
PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:14 pm
 


2Cdo 2Cdo:
Wow, insults immediately because I didn't fall swooning for Gore's fantasy flick.


I said that you didn't know what you were talking about. While that might be an insult, it also happens to be true, so I felt justified in saying so in this case.


$1:
Al's proposed numbers in the film, depicting rising ocean levels exceeded the UN's worse case scenario by tenfold. But I guess you missed that little fact.


Nope, not at all. But I guess you missed the fact about teh movie being "broadly accurate" and the judge agreeing on the scientific consensus regarding anthrpogenic climate change.


$1:
I don't recall saying peace is a joke, maybe you can highlight where I said it. I'm glad you got all of that from a statement that dared to counter your preconcieved notions of Saint Gore and Obama. Again, the only one showing any anger on this thread is yourself. Get over yourself, you're not as smart as you think you are.


Just admit it--your opposition to climate change isn't based on any knowledge you have on the subject. We've both been kicking around here for years and we both know you've never posted a semi-intelligent post on the subject. You've been told what to think by your various pundits.

So I might not be that smart, but I really don't have to be that smart to see through that. In the kingdon of the blind, the one-eyed man is king! :lol:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 21665
PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:17 pm
 


N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:
Semantics. 2cdo didn't even specifically mention the 9 scientific errors (there's lots more than those one's mentioned in the court case) the judge admitted to in court. I know you'd like to distract to that particular case, because you can point to this line, and I can't point to that one; in the end it's just a long distracting argument from the central fact. The central fact being...

Gore's full of crap. You know it. I know it.


And I was just pointing out that he received an Academy Award for his efforts, as well as a Nobel Peace Proze, and the judge in the British case said that the movie contained scientific errors but was "broadly accurate"--an inconvenmient truth odften left out by the skeptics, I note.

But that's OK, I'm sure AGW is a pile of crap because Al Gore is fat.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Previous  1  2  3  4



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.