ziggy ziggy:
DerbyX DerbyX:
I don't get my blood pressure up. Seems to me that you kinda freak out when anybody posts about liberal budget wizardry without needing to make up stories about EI fund stealing.
Like I told RUEZ, its a standard dig between us as we both know we won't change each others mind.
You do get your dander up though anytime the EI fund and the pillaging of it is mentioned. Nothing to brag about when your beating your chest and bragging about taking down the deficit useing insurance funds for workers who paid into it for that reason.
So,I saw what happened,workers denied benefits and the libs beating their chests on how their taking down the deficit,useing these peoples contributions.
So that's why we will never agree on the EI theft.
If I get my dander up then you get yourself worked into a lather.
While I agree it was unfair to change the rules to make it more stringent you are wrong to think they weren't allowed to use it.
EI payments are deducted from income tax owing. Why should they be allowed to pay less income tax then somebody not paying EI when they want it run like a private insurance account?
Since EI funds are deducted out ot taxes collected going into general revenue they therefore become general revenue in that regard.
How can you argue with that logic?
In addition, how can you ignore the fact that Harper used the EI fund surplus to an even greater extent?