[DrCaleb]

BRAH BRAH:

Yeah sexy beautiful is sexual harassment, get your head out of the TDS gutter.

Misogyny is misogyny. As the quote goes, 'let he who is without sin cast the first stone'.

And how can I have TDS, when all I have ever done is quote Trump, word for word? Does that mean he has it too?

[Zipperfish]

Public_Domain Public_Domain:

BRAH BRAH:

Public_Domain Public_Domain:

Rare there's a sentiment from Palin I support.

She's been the victim of the most disgusting sexual harassment any woman politics has faced.

I'm not sure if I'm remembering correctly but I'm pretty sure you posted many of those fake pervy photos of Palin with massive tits, didn't you?

Fucking excellent point, Commie rat. The guys whose post history is 90% hooters is suddenly all in against sexual harassment.

[BartSimpson]

Sunnyways Sunnyways:

We're in a rather hysterical Salemesque moment here where accusations are regarded as unalloyed truth and minor passes at women are being equated with violent sexual assault. The dust should settle before we decide what is true and serious enough to merit the end of a career.

I sincerely agree.

+5

[N_Fiddledog]

OK, so now I'm confused.

I've never actually read anything by this Mike Cernovich character, T warns us against on the previous page. But when Brah told us he was coming out with an expose of another gropey Democrat he told us this one was going to be a big cheese.

That news is out now and the Big Cheese turns out to be Democratic Rep. John Conyers.

Now I'm prepared not to believe this claim because T tells me the Cernovich guy is a fraud.

But Buzzfeed supports the story. Here's where I get confused. Beave uses Buzzfeed as an unchallenged source and Coach ( who seems to be telling us he is the final arbiter of credible media) lets that pass so I've got to believe this Buzzfeed telling is the real thing, right? But can I both believe it and disbelieve it because Cernovich is telling the same story?

But wait...I heard all this on Twitchy.

https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2017/11/ ... cernovich/

That's Michelle Malkin. Without even asking I'm confident she would also be on Coach's Pooh Pooh list, so now I really don't know what to believe.

Especially when the Beave/Coach endorsed Buzzfeed tells me 'this is how Congress hides sexual harassment settlements, according to documents obtained by BuzzFeed. They get paid out as salary, looks like nothing out of the ordinary on paper.'

https://www.buzzfeed.com/paulmcleod/she ... .vjBwppjm3

which sounds credible and apparently, that happened with Conyers.

[N_Fiddledog]

Oh wait...hang on. It's OK.

The sacred CNN tells us, Conyer, is denying everything and as we know when a Democrat denies a claim the denial becomes scriptural truth.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/21/politics/ ... index.html

Unlike how the claim gets an extra coat of credibility when a Republican like Moore issues a denial. Apparently, that one becomes even truer after the denial and grounds for immediate dismissal, unlike when a Democrat like Al Franken commits a sexual assault on video for all to see.

[BRAH]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

BRAH BRAH:

Yeah sexy beautiful is sexual harassment, get your head out of the TDS gutter.

Misogyny is misogyny. As the quote goes, 'let he who is without sin cast the first stone'.

And how can I have TDS, when all I have ever done is quote Trump, word for word? Does that mean he has it too?

______________

You need to look up what sexual harassment really is, it's not a picture of Ivanka Trump calling her sexy. Try asking Sheila Gunn Reid from the Rebel Media who's been a victim of sexual harassment from Leftist Trolls for years. Ask her what it's like then you might have an idea, better yet Google the disgusting vile sexual harassment comments about Sarah Palin. Hell there's even some sick shit that was said against Rachel Notley and Sandra Jansen as no one is immune and both sides are guilty.

[Sunnyways]

Political parties will behave in a partisan fashion. That's what they do. Why we in Canada should get excited about what each party does to protect its own in a foreign country is a bit beyond me. This is most obviously not a problem confined to any one political party, industry or country. Canadian politicians have gotten off pretty lightly so far.

[DrCaleb]

BRAH BRAH:

You need to look up what sexual harassment really is, it's not a picture of Ivanka Trump calling her sexy. Try asking Sheila Gunn Reid from the Rebel Media who's been a victim of sexual harassment from Leftist Trolls for years. Ask her what it's like then you might have an idea, better yet Google the disgusting vile sexual harassment comments about Sarah Palin. Hell there's even some sick shit that was said against Rachel Notley and Sandra Jansen as no one is immune and both sides are guilty.

"Whataboutery".

Read the actual definition I linked to, or to the actual definition of Misogyny, which includes sexual objectification. Yet another thing that you do, while condemning others for doing it. It is exactly linking to a picture of a woman and calling her 'really hot' (the Russian translation).

Own it Brah. I don't give two eggs from the same hen about Shelia, Ivanka, Rachael, nor Al Franken. All I ever ask for is consistency. If you are going to call someone out for something, you best not be guilty of it yourself.

[BRAH]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

BRAH BRAH:

You need to look up what sexual harassment really is, it's not a picture of Ivanka Trump calling her sexy. Try asking Sheila Gunn Reid from the Rebel Media who's been a victim of sexual harassment from Leftist Trolls for years. Ask her what it's like then you might have an idea, better yet Google the disgusting vile sexual harassment comments about Sarah Palin. Hell there's even some sick shit that was said against Rachel Notley and Sandra Jansen as no one is immune and both sides are guilty.

"Whataboutery".

Read the actual definition I linked to, or to the actual definition of Misogyny, which includes sexual objectification. Yet another thing that you do, while condemning others for doing it. It is exactly linking to a picture of a woman and calling her 'really hot' (the Russian translation).

Own it Brah. I don't give two eggs from the same hen about Shelia, Ivanka, Rachael, nor Al Franken. All I ever ask for is consistency. If you are going to call someone out for something, you best not be guilty of it yourself.

Maybe in your Trudeau Feminist because it's 2015 World calling a woman really hot is Misogyny, the CKA hotties thread is Misogyny. There's a difference between saying a woman's really hot to using sexual harassment comments to demean her like the women I've listed have been on the receving end of. Keep mining my posts and using those Laurier talking points because it worked out so well for them, puddin.

[DrCaleb]

BRAH BRAH:

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

BRAH BRAH:

You need to look up what sexual harassment really is, it's not a picture of Ivanka Trump calling her sexy. Try asking Sheila Gunn Reid from the Rebel Media who's been a victim of sexual harassment from Leftist Trolls for years. Ask her what it's like then you might have an idea, better yet Google the disgusting vile sexual harassment comments about Sarah Palin. Hell there's even some sick shit that was said against Rachel Notley and Sandra Jansen as no one is immune and both sides are guilty.

"Whataboutery".

Read the actual definition I linked to, or to the actual definition of Misogyny, which includes sexual objectification. Yet another thing that you do, while condemning others for doing it. It is exactly linking to a picture of a woman and calling her 'really hot' (the Russian translation).

Own it Brah. I don't give two eggs from the same hen about Shelia, Ivanka, Rachael, nor Al Franken. All I ever ask for is consistency. If you are going to call someone out for something, you best not be guilty of it yourself.

Maybe in your Trudeau Feminist because it's 2015 World calling a woman really hot is Misogyny, the CKA hotties thread is Misogyny.

It is. Own it! Be proud! Beauty is a gift to be admired; whether it's a flower, a well engineered car, or a woman. And then don't condemn others when you do the exact same thing!

BRAH BRAH:

There's a difference between saying a woman's really hot to using sexual harassment comments to demean her like the women I've listed have been on the receving end of.

Indeed there is, but the difference is the 'harassment' part. The "Hotties" thread is about sexual objectification, let's not deny that. That's why it had to be hidden away from prying search engines. What it doesn't include, that you decided to throw into the mix, was sexual harassment. Equating the two is lost on me, because I've never treated a woman as anything but my equal. I take no shame in others who treat women, or men, badly as I have no part in it.

BRAH BRAH:

Keep mining my posts and using those Laurier talking points because it worked out so well for them, puddin.

Keep shitposting, and I'll have plenty of material to choose from, sweetie! (*3*)/* If you can't take the criticism, post smarter.

[Zipperfish]

Sunnyways Sunnyways:

We're in a rather hysterical Salemesque moment here where accusations are regarded as unalloyed truth and minor passes at women are being equated with violent sexual assault. The dust should settle before we decide what is true and serious enough to merit the end of a career.

It is a flash fire that will consume the guilty and innocent alike.

Actually read a couple of days ago in the Guardian about Charles Manson: "Why the fascination with a white supremacist and misogynist who masterminded the murder of seven people?" His first sin is being racist, second being sexist and orchestrating a reign of murderous terror is an also-ran. Sign of the times.

[BartSimpson]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

The "Hotties" thread is about sexual objectification, let's not deny that. That's why it had to be hidden away from prying search engines.

Funny that those same search engines have no problem with a bunch of outright porn sites so long as they push a lot of revenue to those search engines.

[BartSimpson]

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

Actually read a couple of days ago in the Guardian about Charles Manson: "Why the fascination with a white supremacist and misogynist who masterminded the murder of seven people?" His first sin is being racist, second being sexist and orchestrating a reign of murderous terror is an also-ran. Sign of the times.

There's no small irony in the fact that Manson was a hero to the left. Even when they were told what the man thought about women and minorities they still lionized him like they do that other mass murdering piece of shit: Che Guevara.

[Sunnyways]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

Actually read a couple of days ago in the Guardian about Charles Manson: "Why the fascination with a white supremacist and misogynist who masterminded the murder of seven people?" His first sin is being racist, second being sexist and orchestrating a reign of murderous terror is an also-ran. Sign of the times.

There's no small irony in the fact that Manson was a hero to the left. Even when they were told what the man thought about women and minorities they still lionized him like they do that other mass murdering piece of shit: Che Guevara.

Manson was a hero to the left? I don’t recall that time.

[Thanos]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

There's no small irony in the fact that Manson was a hero to the left....

At least one neo-Nazi group admired Manson for his race war scenario:

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/11/neo-na ... -race-war/