[N_Fiddledog]

BRAH BRAH:

]
I heard about Akin's comment which the Left spun into their "The Rights War on Women" propaganda. Conservative voters are the biggest whiners because their if the candidate isn't Conservative enough I'm not voting for him plays into the Left's hands everytime via two terms Obama.

Maybe, but are you sure you didn't miss the larger Point.

The Democrat MacCaskill set Akin up, gifting him with the small victory so she could destroy him later, and take the larger prize. She picked her target. Akin could be relied on to say something stupid when she needed him to. It was what he did. He said stupid things.

I'm saying that's what whoever is pulling the strings behind this one in Nevada is doing with Bundy.

They gift him with the little win; make him the target. They create a single enemy in Bundy. They represent him as the icon of the issue of people holding private property the government is going to take. Bundy becomes the head of the beast, then Boom.

It's not actually Bundy they want, you see. It's the larger prize of 'all your private properties belong to us'. So they make Bundy the target. He can be relied on to say something stupid. Destroy his reputation, then nobody has any fight left to object when you take what you really wanted all along.

There's about five major properties I could name they're going after right now, and they all have a better claim to them than Bundy did to his.

But basically, all this is just the same thing they did with Akin.

[Thanos]

There is no larger point. No one else is to blame for morons like Bundy and Akin being incredibly stupid except Bundy and Akin. Knock it off already. And quit defending lawbreaking welfare cheats while you're at it.

[N_Fiddledog]

Sure. Cause you say so, right?

Talk to this guy.



Bundy's just a poor, dumb, old, Nevada, Rancher who had the bad luck to find himself a piece on some real nasty manipulators' chess board.

[Thanos]

Your agreeing he's old and dumb are about the only true things you've said about him. He's a corporate/agricultural welfare-sucking taker with friends in the unhinged-nut gun-waving demographic and, even if he'd been honest and paid his incredibly small and reasonable grazing fees like the law expected him to, he wouldn't have come anywhere near being 'poor'.

[N_Fiddledog]

I see YouTube didn't want people to know what was on that video above. There's been a lot of that lately.

Here's what the Google left doesn't want you to hear from Bundy's black bodyguard when a CNN reporter goes fishing for a clip quote to portray the rambling, old rancher as a racist.

$1:

CNN REPORTER: You’re protecting this man and he’s wondering whether African-Americans would be better off as slaves. How does that strike you?

JASON BULLOCK, BODYGUARD FOR CLIVEN BUNDY: It doesn’t strike me any kind of way. This is still the same old Mr. Bundy I met from the first day of all this happening.

CNN REPORTER: But aren’t those offensive comments to you

BULLOCK: Not at all.

CNN REPORTER: Not offensive?

BULLOCK: Because Mr. Bundy is not a racist. Ever since I’ve been here he’s treated me with nothing but hospitality. He’s pretty much treated me like his own family.

###

BULLOCK: I would take a bullet for that man, if need be. I look up to him just like I do my own grandfather.

CNN REPORTER: Why?

BULLOCK: Because I believe in his cause and after having met Mr. Bundy a few times, I have a really good feel about him and I’m a pretty good judge of character.

It was government over-reach ostensibly to collect on a debt. BLM claims grazing fees. Bundy claims they wanted land management fees for a service that drove 52 of his fellow ranchers off the land. The set-up to portray Bundy as a racist, changes nothing. It was about the land, and we haven't seen the last of these paramilitary forces being formed out of government bureaucracies to move Americans off their land.

[Public_Domain]