[andyt]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

You left out the part where the surviving uninvolved slobs become radicals as result of losing everything and retaliate through terrorism or other means, which the right-tards then use to retroactively justify their actions.

No, he left out the part where great big assholes (that's a specific reference to you, just in case you forgot) insist on importing threats to Western civilization into our countries and are then outraged at anyone who points out the obvious idiocy of that decision.

The solution here that is in the best interests of civilized people (not to include great big assholes) is to deport Muslims back to countries where their kind of thinking is welcome and where they won't have to worry about having to kill everyone who doesn't kiss their collective asses like you do.

So just for the record, you're back to saying that all Muslims are terrorists, and that you think rounding them all up en masse will lead to less violence, instead of the obvious more violence. Do I have that right?

Well, Bart sounds a lot like this: when he lectures Europe like that. I suggest he start at home and push to have Muslims expelled from the US.

[BRAH]

Anonymous Takes Down 5,500 ISIS Accounts – 24 Hours After ISIS Called them “Idiots”

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/opparis-anonymous-takes-5500-isis-twitter-accounts-24-hours/

Anonymous Tells Facebook and Law Enforcement To Get Out of Their Way and Let Them Fight ISIS

http://countercurrentnews.com/2015/11/anonymous-tells-facebook-and-law-enforcement-to-get-out-of-their-way/#
_______________________

[DrCaleb]

BRAH BRAH:

'Traitor' Edward Snowden 'taught ISIS Paris terrorists how to avoid detection'

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/620270/Traitor-Edward-Snowden-taught-ISIS-Paris-terrorists-avoid-detection-NSA-CIA-John-Brennan
____________________

This is possible because of the Snowden leaks.

No, it's not. Encryption existed before Snowden.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ectly.html

[martin14]

BRAH BRAH:

Anonymous Takes Down 5,500 ISIS Accounts – 24 Hours After ISIS Called them “Idiots”

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/opparis-anonymous-takes-5500-isis-twitter-accounts-24-hours/

Anonymous Tells Facebook and Law Enforcement To Get Out of Their Way and Let Them Fight ISIS

http://countercurrentnews.com/2015/11/anonymous-tells-facebook-and-law-enforcement-to-get-out-of-their-way/#
_______________________

Funny how Merkel can ask Zuckerberg directly about helping to shut down any form of protest over the migrants,
But ISIS accounts ?
No problem.

[DrCaleb]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

BRAH BRAH:

'Traitor' Edward Snowden 'taught ISIS Paris terrorists how to avoid detection'

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/620270/Traitor-Edward-Snowden-taught-ISIS-Paris-terrorists-avoid-detection-NSA-CIA-John-Brennan
____________________

This is possible because of the Snowden leaks.

No, it's not. Encryption existed before Snowden.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ectly.html

And the story was false.

$1:

The New York Times has pulled a story it published Monday stating that French officials speaking off the record had said the Paris attackers used encrypted communications to coordinate their attacks with ISIS.

http://arstechnica.com/information-tech ... cials-say/

[Tyler_1]

Is this going to all turn into World War Eleventeen?

I don't want to watch that happen.

[BartSimpson]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

So just for the record, you're back to saying that all Muslims are terrorists, and that you think rounding them all up en masse will lead to less violence, instead of the obvious more violence. Do I have that right?

So just for the record, you're saying that all Muslims are inherently violent and rounding them up for deportation will cause them to act on their violent tendencies?

Do I have that right? Because it sure sounds like that's what you just admitted to here.

If the Muslims are as potentially violent as you fear they are then why do you want more of them?

[BartSimpson]

andyt andyt:

Well, Bart sounds a lot like this: when he lectures Europe like that. I suggest he start at home and push to have Muslims expelled from the US.

[BeaverFever]

Wouldn't you agree that if the government started mass arrests of any race or religion that there would be a violent reaction?

You've made it clear on several occasions that you would respond violently if your government stepped over the line with you. And look at the unrest in Ferguson.

Why would this be any different?

[BRAH]

martin14 martin14:

BRAH BRAH:

Anonymous Takes Down 5,500 ISIS Accounts – 24 Hours After ISIS Called them “Idiots”

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/opparis-anonymous-takes-5500-isis-twitter-accounts-24-hours/

Anonymous Tells Facebook and Law Enforcement To Get Out of Their Way and Let Them Fight ISIS

http://countercurrentnews.com/2015/11/anonymous-tells-facebook-and-law-enforcement-to-get-out-of-their-way/#
_______________________

Funny how Merkel can ask Zuckerberg directly about helping to shut down any form of protest over the migrants,
But ISIS accounts ?
No problem.

Merkel is insane history will not judge her nicely and for Zuck he's CEO Bitch!

[BRAH]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

BRAH BRAH:

'Traitor' Edward Snowden 'taught ISIS Paris terrorists how to avoid detection'

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/620270/Traitor-Edward-Snowden-taught-ISIS-Paris-terrorists-avoid-detection-NSA-CIA-John-Brennan
____________________

This is possible because of the Snowden leaks.

No, it's not. Encryption existed before Snowden.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ectly.html

And the story was false.

$1:

The New York Times has pulled a story it published Monday stating that French officials speaking off the record had said the Paris attackers used encrypted communications to coordinate their attacks with ISIS.

http://arstechnica.com/information-tech ... cials-say/

The New York Times is credible as Rolling Stone.

[BartSimpson]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

Wouldn't you agree that if the government started mass arrests of any race or religion that there would be a violent reaction?

No. The perfect example are the Japanese, Germans, and Italians who were arrested and detained in both Canada and the USA during WW2.

None of the civilian detainees committed any acts of violence against their governments relative to their being detained.

Not one.

Your conclusion that doing the same thing with Muslims would provoke them to violence is quite an admission on your part that you think they're inherently violent and all they need is a reason to set them off. Your main argument is that people like myself are providing them with an excuse to act violently but the logic of your argument actually justifies their detention and eventual deportation because of the inherent threat they pose to public order and public safety.

[BeaverFever]

$1:

No. The perfect example are the Japanese, Germans, and Italians who were arrested and detained in both Canada and the USA during WW2.

None of the civilian detainees committed any acts of violence against their governments relative to their being detained.

Not one.

That was then. I don' t think that would happen now. As I said look at Ferguson. Look at your own threats about shooting any officer who tramples your rights.

[herbie]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

Wouldn't you agree that if the government started mass arrests of any race or religion that there would be a violent reaction?

No. The perfect example are the Japanese, Germans, and Italians who were arrested and detained in both Canada and the USA during WW2.

None of the civilian detainees committed any acts of violence against their governments relative to their being detained.

Not one.

Your conclusion that doing the same thing with Muslims would provoke them to violence is quite an admission on your part that you think they're inherently violent and all they need is a reason to set them off. Your main argument is that people like myself are providing them with an excuse to act violently but the logic of your argument actually justifies their detention and eventual deportation because of the inherent threat they pose to public order and public safety.

Just out of curiosity, how can you use this to support your argument when it proves the action was the wrong one (not one guilty of anything) and we've spent decades issuing public apologies for detaining them and building monuments to remind us?
Isn't that the strongest example of why we should NOT single out one group?

[DrCaleb]

BRAH BRAH:

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

No, it's not. Encryption existed before Snowden.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ectly.html

And the story was false.

$1:

The New York Times has pulled a story it published Monday stating that French officials speaking off the record had said the Paris attackers used encrypted communications to coordinate their attacks with ISIS.

http://arstechnica.com/information-tech ... cials-say/

The New York Times is credible as Rolling Stone.

Exactly. And that's where the Express got their information. This will tell you all you need to know about the Express.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/6 ... cott-Kelly