|
Author |
Topic Options
|
andyt
CKA Uber
Posts: 33492
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 8:32 am
Thanos Thanos: Now that he's informed all of us about what he thinks of The Niggras, I look forward to further enlightenment from him on The Queerboys, The Wimmen, The Catlicks, and The Heebs. It's funny how this stuff all seems to just naturally write itself. Free comedy owns.  From previous comments you've made here, it doesn't appear you and bundy and bart are all that far apart. these are the shwanaias (or whatever you called them) he's talking about, same as you were. Ghetto blacks. Just because they weren't in Detroit doesn't make these ones worthy of respect while denigrating the ones in Detroit.
|
Posts: 21665
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 8:39 am
andyt andyt: From previous comments you've made here, it doesn't appear you and bundy and bart are all that far apart. these are the shwanaias (or whatever you called them) he's talking about, same as you were. Ghetto blacks. Just because they weren't in Detroit doesn't make these ones worthy of respect while denigrating the ones in Detroit. No, I don't think so. Not even close. What a stupid thing to say.
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 8:48 am
Oh for sure, john.
|
Posts: 65472
|
Posts: 65472
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:32 am
andyt andyt: Too loony to make a coherent reply. You are. Nice to see we agree on something.
|
andyt
CKA Uber
Posts: 33492
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:38 am
BartSimpson BartSimpson: andyt andyt: I doubt that Cosby et al said blacks would be better off as slaves. Here's the Bill Cosby article that he wrote that speaks to what I said: http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/1108/p09s01-coop.html$1: One way slaves survived brutal conditions was to turn the Christianity they had learned into a liberation theology. The stories of the Hebrew slaves became their own. Even as slave owners used the Bible to justify slavery, black people used the Bible as God intended – to give people hope for a time when there would be true justice. Sure, I see, his views are identical to Bundy's
|
andyt
CKA Uber
Posts: 33492
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:39 am
BartSimpson BartSimpson: andyt andyt: Too loony to make a coherent reply. You are. Nice to see we agree on something. I know you are but what am I? Really?
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:12 am
|
Posts: 9445
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:25 am
N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog: "Who cares? He could believe Bette Midler is the 12th Imam, it doesn't change the fact that the government has sent SWAT teams to collect a tax bill from a free citizen."
~ Kira Davis ~
His delivery was less than desirable but when you look at his point you can't deny he's right because the black community has become slaves to the system of the Federal Government and when they come to seize your land, personal property etc the color of your skin doesn't matter.
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:41 am
Basically what Reid and the boys pulled off here is just what I call "Sneaky Prog Trick #113b", or the "The Todd Akin Technique".
You remember Todd Akin from the last American elections, right?
I'll respark the memory.
Claire MacCaskill, Democratic senator from Missouri was up for re-election. The district had turned flaming red Republican, and she didn't appear to have a chance. She was the incumbent. Her last term had been filled with lies and corruption. She was not well liked. You could have damn near ran a goat under the Republican banner and won.
However...there was a Republican primary. The Dems picked their target. Old, Social Conservative Todd Akin could be relied on to run off at the mouth. McCaskill's team crafted a series of ads claiming Akin was the true Conservative in the campaign and seemed to suggest they were afraid of him. It was, "Please Br'er Fox don't throw me in the briar patch" (if you know that one).
Akin wasn't expected to win, but he did. The real campaign began against McCaskill and all of a sudden an interview turned up from a democrat flavored talk show host where Akin was talking about how women could will themselves not to get pregnant in cases of what he called "Legitimate Rape". The interview had been made during the Republican primary, but they waited until the general election against McCaskill to spring it on the general public, and the larger leftist media then sprang into action with foam at the mouths, making it a number one story.
Miraculously McCaskill won. Statistics showed the Conservative voters did not show up at the polls.
This is what the dirty deed Dems are trying to do again with Bundy.
They knew he was an old-timer, cowboy, bit of a bigot who could be relied on to run off at the mouth with the right prompting. One could ask how he even got on the subject of black people in Las Vegas. It was a press interview, wasn't it?
But this is not about Bundy. It never has been. The government is campaigning against private property in Texas, New Mexico, Wyoming...Hell in Wyoming they're want a whole city.
Bundy was just the weak link. He was just the guy you could rely on to say or do something stupid, then you do what you really want to do when people are too discouraged to fight back.
I don't think it will work this time though.
Last edited by N_Fiddledog on Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Posts: 19941
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:44 am
No one held a gun those people's heads to force them to say what they said.
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:48 am
It was a set-up. Just like if I wanted somebody to make some sort of dumb Commie flavored comment, I go to... 
Last edited by N_Fiddledog on Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Posts: 65472
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:52 am
xerxes xerxes: No one held a gun those people's heads to force them to say what they said. Let's say, for instance, that you get robbed at gunpoint and during the course of the police investigation they find some one of your posts on CKA that makes you look bad. Should they stop investigating the crime against you because of some thing you said? Does your speech somehow legitimize the crime that took place against you? Then it doesn't matter what Bundy could say, did say, or might say. The corrupt politician who schemed to steal Bundy's land (he has a vested title) under color of authority is still guilty of a crime and the son of a bitch Harry Reid should be censured, ejected from the Senate, and then prosecuted for corruption.
|
Posts: 19941
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:53 pm
So Bundy is the victim now? If you don't pay your bills and the repo man comes to repossess your things, the repo man isn't the thief.
|
Posts: 65472
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:59 pm
xerxes xerxes: So Bundy is the victim now? If you don't pay your bills and the repo man comes to repossess your things, the repo man isn't the thief. The man's family grazed cattle on land they have a vested title to for over 100 years and then in 1993 the BLM comes along and asked them to voluntarily join in a plan to improve yields. The Bundy's and 52 other families signed up and paid grazing fees to pay for the promised services. The services never happened. Instead the BLM 'managed' all of the other ranchers out of the ranching business. Bundy stopped paying the fees because the promised services were never provided. Then earlier this year the approximately $200,000 in past due fees were illegally and retroactively increased by the BLM to over $1 million with the intent of bankrupting Bundy. It is to be noted that the BLM is now only asking for the original amount to be paid, not the $1 million-plus they were telling the media about. In this case the repo man is, indeed, a thief.
|
|
Page 21 of 23
|
[ 336 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests |
|
|